Laserfiche WebLink
Bolton & Menk, Inc. <br /> Proposal QTB175606 <br /> April 4, 2023 <br /> Page 2 <br /> (4) Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not <br /> contaminated. <br /> Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of <br /> the property? If you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower <br /> purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? <br /> (5) Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property. <br /> Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property <br /> that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or <br /> threatened releases? For example, <br /> (a) Do you know the past uses of the property? If so, please explain. <br /> (b) Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? <br /> If so, please explain. <br /> (c) Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? <br /> If so, please explain. <br /> (d) Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? <br /> If so, please explain. <br /> (6) The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the <br /> property,and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation. <br /> Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property, are there any obvious <br /> indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? If so, <br /> please explain. <br /> BRAUN <br />