Laserfiche WebLink
pavement sections. He noted that underlying soils generally do not change over time and the CIP <br /> does not address replacement of the 1999 road grader. <br /> Councilmember Olson asked the cost of completing the boring and geotechnical reports. <br /> City Engineer/Public Works Director Westby replied that the cost would be estimated at $25,000 <br /> to $30,000. He confirmed that the soil boring information would be good for decades, while the <br /> only element that may fluctuate would be groundwater levels. <br /> Councilmember Olson commented that completing the borings and geotechnical report would <br /> place the City in a nimble position where it could move forward if the opportunity arose and <br /> therefore supported the action. <br /> Councilmember Howell stated that she would support the soil borings to have the information on <br /> hand but is unsure she would want to support a paving project at this time. <br /> Chairperson Musgrove commented that she would want to look at the policy. She explained that <br /> the cost of the grader and staff time would be spread across the whole city. She stated that perhaps <br /> the formula for paving those gravel roads should be reviewed as the current policy for funding <br /> road improvements using assessments is 25 percent assessment and the remainder is covered <br /> through the levy. She stated that perhaps the residents on gravel roads would support paving if <br /> their assessment was 25 percent rather than 50 percent. She stated that she would also be hesitant <br /> to move forward with paving as some residents on the gravel roads do not want that, but would <br /> agree that having the soil boring information would be an advantage and allow them to move <br /> forward if the opportunity presented itself <br /> City Engineer/Public Works Director Westby commented that the special assessment policy was <br /> drafted with the 50150 split for gravel roads. He believed that the PIR fund would be a good <br /> funding source for the borings and geotechnical work. He commented that there is a city-wide <br /> benefit to paving the roads as there is no longer a grader included in the CIP and maintenance costs <br /> and needs would decrease as well. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Howell, seconded by Councilmember Olson, to direct staff to obtain <br /> soil borings for all remaining gravel roads and to explore subgrade correction and stormwater <br /> management needs as required to convert the gravel roads to bituminous pavement sections. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Musgrove,Councilmembers Howell and Olson. Voting <br /> No: None. <br /> Chairperson Musgrove confirmed the consensus of the Committee to discuss the gravel road <br /> paving policy at a future meeting. <br /> City Engineer/Public Works Director Westby replied that policy was never formally adopted. It <br /> was confirmed that could be a topic of discussion when the soil borings information is presented <br /> to the Committee. <br /> Public Works Committee/February 20, 2024 <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br />