Laserfiche WebLink
pavement sections. He noted that underlying soils generally do not change over time and the CIP <br />does not address replacement of the 1999 road grader. <br />Councilmember Olson asked the cost of completing the boring and geotechnical reports. <br />City Engineer/Public Works Director Westby replied that the cost would be estimated at $25,000 <br />to $30,000. He confirmed that the soil boring information would be good for decades, while the <br />only element that may fluctuate would be groundwater levels. <br />Councilmember Olson commented that completing the borings and geotechnical report would <br />place the City in a nimble position where it could move forward if the opportunity arose and <br />therefore supported the action. <br />Councilmember Howell stated that she would support the soil borings to have the information on <br />hand but is unsure she would want to support a paving project at this time. <br />Chairperson Musgrove commented that she would want to look at the policy. She explained that <br />the cost of the grader and staff time would be spread across the whole city. She stated that perhaps <br />the formula for paving those gravel roads should be reviewed as the current policy for funding <br />road improvements using assessments is 25 percent assessment and the remainder is covered <br />through the levy. She stated that perhaps the residents on gravel roads would support paving if <br />their assessment was 25 percent rather than 50 percent. She stated that she would also be hesitant <br />to move forward with paving as some residents on the gravel roads do not want that, but would <br />agree that having the soil boring information would be an advantage and allow them to move <br />forward if the opportunity presented itself. <br />City Engineer/Public Works Director Westby commented that the special assessment policy was <br />drafted with the 50/50 split for gravel roads. He believed that the PIR fund would be a good <br />funding source for the borings and geotechnical work. He commented that there is a city-wide <br />benefit to paving the roads as there is no longer a grader included in the CIP and maintenance costs <br />and needs would decrease as well. <br />on by Councilmember Howell, seconded by Councilmember Olson, to direct staff to obtain <br />Moti <br />soil borings for all remaining gravel roads and to explore subgrade correction and stormwater <br />management needs as required to convert the gravel roads to bituminous pavement sections. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Musgrove, Councilmembers Howell and Olson. Voting <br />No: None. <br />Chairperson Musgrove confirmed the consensus of the Committee to discuss the gravel road <br />paving policy at a future meeting. <br />City Engineer/Public Works Director Westby replied that policy was never formally adopted. It <br />was confirmed that could be a topic of discussion when the soil borings information is presented <br />to the Committee. <br />Public Works Committee / February 20, 2024 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br /> <br />