Laserfiche WebLink
y� <br /> Y <br /> k(l <br /> iz <br /> 7550 Sunwood Drive NW � Ramsey,MN 55303 <br /> 1 <br /> Ci ty of <br /> 1► City Hall: 763.427.1410 ■Fax: 763.427.5543 s Y <br /> .... w...�..............._�... .,.�....,�..... ...._... ...�.�..... www.cityofi-amsey.com <br /> .-.. ,-..-.....-�-,-.w:noa:..n+:-.`^•'r^,.F.:x..sr9e+-u:;..rvx..--.-,^.p-,.a:�x;+.^-ml. ._. ._..-u.ti.':��.'v.°i-.'}L,_.5vw.rn�'^:.h;5.`��r�.^_^`.'�:_?cT/�r...':' .�1-•YY"�wis.'-.1"., _�..:......wx..,�N.-...�.�-mY�..w-:-...-rv....,..._..s:....J-.:..�..T..�-._r.....�.^,"w-- ' !+.' <br /> POTENTIAL PEDESTRIAN TRAIL CONNECTION SURVEY (IP #24-07) <br /> Purpose of this Surrey <br /> The City of Ramsey is seeking input from residents of Bowers Drive and the Riverstone South development on <br /> whether a 10-foot bituminous pedestrian trail connection would be supported between Bowers Drive and the <br /> new Riverstone South development, Enclosed is an exhibit showing the location of the potential pedestrian <br /> trail connection corridor,as well as amenities this trail would provide more convenient access to. <br /> During the Riverstone South development process,the City surveyed Bowers Drive residents to see if they <br /> supported construction of a public road connection,a Public Safety and Public Works maintenance <br /> connection,or no second connection to Bowers Drive at all. The results of that survey demonstrated that <br /> Bowers Drive residents did not support a second connection between Bowers Drive and the new Riverstone <br /> South development. At the time,the City Council voted to not construct a second access road. However,it <br /> was also decided that this topic should be explored again if/when a future opportunity presented itself. <br /> In 20241,Bowers Drive is proposed to receive pavement overlay improvements with 2024 Neighborhood <br /> Pavement Overlays,Improvement Project#24-07,and a paved trail connection could be cost-effectively <br /> constructed as part of this project. Staff will therefore share the results of this survey with the City Council <br /> while discussing whether to add a pedestrian trail connection to the project. If a trail connection were to be <br /> constructed there would be no direct cost to local residents, <br /> Property Owner Contact Information <br /> The City requests that only one response be submitted per property receiving this survey,and that the name <br /> and address of the respondent be provided below. <br /> Property owner Name: <br /> s C . <br /> Property Address: -� <br /> p IV� Mmu/ "J�r2 0 <br /> Surrey Question <br /> For purposes of pedestrian connectivity to area amenities,do you support a second access to Bowers Drive? <br /> f" <br /> YES,I support paved pedestrian tram connection. . <br /> pp a p <br /> O,I do not support a paged pedestrian trail connection. <br /> Comments <br /> r.,.. <br /> i <br /> Y <br /> S <br /> .y <br /> Please return in the enclosed selfaddressed stamped enrelope l March 124 <br /> It is our mission to work together to responsihly grow our conimmnity,and to provide quality,cost-effective and efficient government <br /> services. �! <br />