My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 03/26/2024
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2024
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 03/26/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:12:56 AM
Creation date
4/2/2024 11:26:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
03/26/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Phone Number <br /> For purposes of Public Safety Response,do you support a second access to Bowers Drive?* <br /> Yes, I support a full public road connection <br /> Yes, but only if it is used by Public Safety (and Public Works Maintenance) <br /> No, I do not support a second connection to Bowers Drive <br /> Other(please describe below) <br /> Disclaimer <br /> For purposes of this survey, a non-response will be considered as a non-objection to the connection. <br /> Please comment and explain your response above. <br /> don't see the benefit or the actual need case, nor any data or history justifying the change. If the potential issue is a tree <br /> falling across the road, the city could instead proactively trim trees. As the structure of Bowers Drive is not on the table, it <br /> would seem to be of minimal benefit to have a 24 foot wide road with curb and gutter as the public works department is <br /> proposing rather than a wide trail, as the rest of the road does not have this structure either. If a road were required, a formal <br /> barrier would be important to restrict access and would be minimal hindrance to public safety. Perhaps a better investment <br /> would be fire hydrants. My primary concern is that the road would draw additional vehicle traffic from new development residents <br /> looking for an alternate route to highway 10. Bowers drive already has a large number of residents who exercise, walk, & and <br /> take pets along Bowers Drive. Additional auto traffic would pose a significant danger to residents, outweighing any potential <br /> safety benefits from a second access.Additionally, extra walkers from the new development looking to complete a loop <br /> between the new development and Bowers Drive would add to the number of pedestrians, bikes or dogs along the road, further <br /> exacerbating the new hazard created by the proposed new access road. Finally, I am concerned this is just step one of a larger <br /> plan by city developers to change Bowers drive road, widening the access, adding curb&gutter, etc. which would change the <br /> character of the neighborhood and negatively impact the current lot structure. If public safety is truly the concern of the city- <br /> improving or revising entrance and exit access to Bowers Drive should be the first focus-the current access to/from the <br /> neighborhood from Highway 10 is extremely dangerous-not enough distance to accelerate or decelerate, as well hazard of <br /> crossing the highway. This hazard would get worse with additional traffic from the new development using the access road as a <br /> short cut up Bowers Drive onto Highway 10. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.