My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/02/2024 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2024
>
Agenda - Council - 04/02/2024 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:13:52 AM
Creation date
4/3/2024 8:52:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
04/02/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'Missing middle'housing bill concerns city officials I Prior Lake I swn... https://www.swnewsmedia.com/prior lake_american/missing-middle-h... <br /> and multiplexes. The bill was recently amended and approved by the Housing Finance and <br /> Policy Committee. The bill awaits its first hearing in the Senate. <br /> At the Feb. 27 Prior Lake City Council meeting, Mayor Kirt Briggs brought up some concerns <br /> within the bill that would eliminate local control at the city level. <br /> "There is a bill circulating in the House, soon in the Senate, that would bring lasting and <br /> significant consequences to every homeowner and tax-payer in cities across Minnesota," <br /> Briggs said. "This bill is a preemption that puts in place one-size fits all zoning in our current <br /> existing neighborhoods. What it does is, if it passes into law, it will eliminate city authority to <br /> oversee local planning and zoning in residential neighborhoods." <br /> According to legislation, the bills HF 4009 and SF 3964 would essentially eliminate <br /> single-family zoning in Minnesota towns with a population above 101000. It also takes away <br /> the ability of towns and cities to shape housing with rules about parking and aesthetics, or <br /> whether lots can be subdivided. <br /> "The law would give a for-profit developer the full right to purchase your neighbor's home, <br /> tear it down and replace it with a fourplex," Briggs said. "While the law gives the developer <br /> the full protection of statute to do just that, it also strips each and everyone one of us a right <br /> that we all enjoy today, which is the right to a public hearing so that I could bring my voice of <br /> support or opposition to this new development." <br /> Briggs argued that the bill could potentially create infrastructure issues because as the bill <br /> sits now, there would be no need to adjust sewer/water pipes and developers would retrofit <br /> the current single family home water main and sewer to accommodate up to six more <br /> housing units. <br /> "The unplanned density would sit on top of our existing infrastructure. If demand exceeds <br /> capacity and if you put too many of these high density units on that infrastructure, tax <br /> payers would be left with one of two unpleasant realities," Briggs said. "It would allow for the <br /> degradation of the public safety or incur the cost burden of retrofitting that infrastructure <br /> that was brought on by the new and unplanned for growth." <br /> City Managerjason Wedel added that even though the underlying premise of the bill is t <br /> create more affordable housing, nowhere in the bill does it state it will require any ofth ® ' <br /> 2 of 3 4/2/2024, 1:09 PM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.