My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 11/06/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2006
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 11/06/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:30:22 PM
Creation date
4/19/2024 9:32:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
11/06/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
management, type of disturbance, presence of non-native invasive trees, dominant trees and quality of the natural <br />community. <br />In order to find out something about the future forests and woodlands of Ramsey, we separated out information <br />relating to those trees 4" or less DBH. Trees less than this diameter are traditionally known by foresters as <br />regeneration. In this study, trees of this size class may represent trees planted by landowners or natural <br />regeneration. <br />Results <br />Combined Data. A total of 55 tree species were represented by 2,333 <br />trees. 870 trees were counted in the plots located in Areas 1 (244 trees), 2 <br />(260 trees) & 4 (366 trees). 1,463 trees were counted in Area 3. Of the 55 <br />species, 23 were represented by less than ten trees. The most common tree <br />found was red pine followed by Siberian elm, bur oak, boxelder and Colorado <br />blue spruce. Red pine made up 22.2% of all trees surveyed while no other <br />species accounted for as much as 5%. Of some significance is the fact that <br />only seven red pines were found in Areas i, 2 & 4 combined, while over 500 <br />were found in area 3. <br />Three invasive species, Siberian elm, common buckthorn and Amur maple <br />together account for over i i% of the total number of trees. <br />Rank <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />Table 1. Twenty Most Common Trees <br />Species <br />Pine, red <br />Elm, Siberian <br />Oak, bur <br />Boxelder <br />Spruce, Colo. blue <br />Ash, green <br />Buckthorn <br />Oak, red <br />Ash, prickly <br />Ash, black <br />Spruce, white <br />Aspen <br />Cherry, black <br />Cherry, ornamental <br />Crabapple <br />Maple, Amur <br />Maple, silver <br />Pine, eastern white <br />Redcedar, eastern <br />Pine, jack <br />Count Percent <br />517 22.2 <br />114 4.9 <br />113 4.8 <br />102 4.4 <br />102 4.4 <br />89 3.8 <br />84 3.6 <br />79 3.4 <br />76 3.3 <br />75 3.2 <br />75 3.2 <br />74 3.2 <br />72 3.1 <br />71 3.0 <br />68 2.9 <br />60 2.6 <br />58 2.5 <br />56 2.4 <br />56 2.4 <br />45 1.9 <br />Note: Caution should be used in <br />any attempt to draw conclusions <br />from the combined data. <br />Different methods of sampling <br />were used to obtain the <br />information. Also, there is no <br />indication the subdivisions used <br />in this survey are <br />representative of the City as a <br />whole, these types of <br />subdivisions or of any forested <br />cover type. <br />A complete tree list can be found in the Appendix. <br />Area 1. The 244 trees counted in Area i represented 28 different species. However, most of the tree species <br />tallied in Area i were found only occasionally or rarely - ten species were only represented by a single tree. <br />Boxelder (16.8%), buckthorn (14.8%), bur oak (13.1%), prickly ash (9.4%) and aspen (8.6%) were the most <br />common trees, in that order. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.