My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/12/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2012
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/12/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:11:28 AM
Creation date
4/25/2024 2:02:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
07/12/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Bulletin May 10, 2012 I Volume 6 I Issue 9 <br />Particular Uses —State Agency <br />Approves Wind Energy Project <br />Opponents dispute finding that project will have <br />"attributable" "tangible benefits" <br />Citation: Friends of Boundary Mountains v. Land Use Regulation Com'n, <br />2012 ME 53, 2012 WL 1134914 (Me. 2012) <br />MAINE (04/05/12)—This case addressed the issue of the interpretation of <br />"tangible benefits" required for approval of a wind energy project under Maine <br />statutory law. <br />The Background/Facts: In December 2009, TransCanada filed an applica- <br />tion with Maine's Land Use Regulation Commission ("LURC") for a permit <br />to construct the Kibby Expansion Wind Power Project in the townships of <br />Kibby and Chain of Ponds. As initially proposed, the project was a 45 <br />megawatt wind energy generation facility, including 15 wind turbines, created <br />as an expansion of an existing 44-turbine wind facility operated by <br />TransCanada. <br />Following the public comment period, LURC voted to approve TransCana- <br />da's amended application. Among other things, LURC's decision found that <br />the project would provide "significant tang[ible] benefits" as a result of the <br />following: "the employment of several hundred workers during construction; <br />economic benefits to local businesses during the construction period; the cre- <br />ation of one permanent job in operations and maintenance; a $110,000 grant <br />from TransCanada to the Department of Labor (DOL) to support green jobs <br />training in Franklin County; $13million in anticipated income taxes over the <br />next twenty-five years; a $110,000 grant from TransCanada to the High Peaks <br />Alliance (HPA) to support land conservation in Franklin County; and $10 mil- <br />lion in property taxes over the next twenty years." LURC also noted that <br />TransCanada planned to contribute approximately $660,000 to the local com- <br />munity over the next 20 years as part of a "community benefits package," <br />Maine statutory law, 12 M.R.S. § 685-B(4-B)(D), requires that a developer of a <br />wind energy project (here, TransCanada) must demonstrate that the proposed <br />generating facility "[w]ill provide significant tangible benefits." "Tangible <br />benefits" is defined under 35-A M.R.S. § 3451(10). Effective July 12, 2010, <br />"tangible benefits" was defined as meaning:environmental or economic improve- <br />ments or benefits to residents of [Maine] attributable to the construction, opera- <br />tion and maintenance of an expedited wind energy development, including but not <br />limited to: property tax payments resulting from the development; other payments <br />to a host community, including but not limited to, payments under a community <br />benefit agreement; construction related employment; local purchase of materials; <br />employment in operations and maintenance; reduced property taxes; reduced <br />electrical rates; land or natural resource conservation; performance of construc- <br />tion, operations and maintenance activities by trained, qualified and licensed <br />workers . . . ; or other comparable benefits, with particular attention to assurance <br />of such benefits to the host community or communities to the extent practicable <br />and affected neighboring communities. <br />© 2012 Thomson Reuters 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.