Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Bulletin May 10, 2012 I Volume 6 I Issue 9 <br />Case Note: <br />The court also found that, notwithstanding LURC's conclusion that the "community <br />benefits package" and the payments to DOL and HPA fell within the definition of the <br />"tangible benefits" that are "attributable to the construction, operation and mainte- <br />nance" found in the preamendment version of § 3451(10), LURC made other findings <br />that would independently support its decision to approve TransCanada's amended <br />application. Specifically, LURC had found the project would, among other things: <br />result in several hundred jobs; provide indirect benefits to local businesses during the <br />construction period; create one additional permanent job in operations and mainte- <br />nance; and generate an estimated $13 million in state income taxes over a 25-year <br />period. <br />oning News from Around the Nation <br />MARYLAND <br />The state Senate recently passed legislation that would require counties to <br />draw mapped "tiers" of development before any major subdivisions served by <br />septic systems could be approved. The bill now moves to the House. <br />Source: The Washington Post; www.washingtonpost.com <br />MISSOURI <br />The state House of Representatives has given first -round approval to a mea- <br />sure that would "declare that farmers have a `right to raise livestock.' " Under <br />the measure, livestock farmers would be exempt from "local, state or federal <br />laws enacted after the farm goes into business or Aug. 28, 2012, whichever is <br />later." This would exempt Missouri livestock farmers from new zoning and <br />environmental laws, among other laws. Bill supporters say the measure <br />"would give farm -related businesses more certainty about laws so that they <br />can make long-term investments." Opponents of the measure argue the mea- <br />sure "would create confusion for state and local agencies trying to enforce <br />laws and ordinances because the agency would have to know if the farm <br />existed when the law was created" and "could make it more difficult for the <br />state to enact and enforce agricultural regulations during farm -related emer- <br />gencies, such as a disease outbreak, because some businesses would have to <br />comply, while others would not." The bill must be approved once more by the <br />House before it goes to the Senate for consideration. <br />Source: Columbia Daily Tribune; www.columbiatribune.com <br />NEW YORK <br />A substantive.amendment to the New York Open Meeting Law went into <br />effect in February 2012. The new law "requires public records that are <br />scheduled to be the subject of discussion during an open meeting to be avail- <br />© 2012 Thomson Reuters 11 <br />