Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Bulletin May 25, 2012 I Volume 6 I No. 10 <br />Citation: Conservation Com'n of Brockton v. Department of Environmental <br />Protection, 81 Mass. App. Ct. 601, 2012 WL 1320214 (2012) <br />MASSACHUSETTS (04/19/12)—This case addressed the issue of whether <br />public service corporations (e.g., utility companies) can request local zoning <br />exemption from the Department of Public Utilities (as provided by Mas- <br />sachusetts statutory law) prior to filing a notice of intent required under the <br />state's Wetlands Protection Act. In other words, does a utility company's ap- <br />plication for exemption from local zoning under Mass. Gen. L. c. 40A, § 3 <br />satisfy the state Wetlands Protection Act requirement that applicants seek all <br />obtainable local permits and approvals when filing a notice of intent with the <br />local conservation commission? <br />The Background/Facts: Brockton Power Company, LLC ("Brockton <br />Power") proposed to construct a 350 megawatt power plant (the "plant"). The <br />plant was to be located in the city of Brockton (the "City"). Part of the plant <br />was to be within 100 feet of vegetated wetlands bordering the Salisbury Plain <br />River. <br />The state Wetlands Protection Act ("WPA") prohibits certain activities that <br />would alter wetlands in the absence of a wetlands permit. (Mass. Gen. L. c. <br />131, § 40.) The WPA provides that a person desiring to perform "work" <br />within the 100-foot area surrounding wetlands (the "buffer zone") that would <br />alter the wetlands may be required to file a notice of intent ("NOI") with the <br />local conservation commission and obtain a permit, known as an order of <br />conditions. (Mass. Gen. L. c. 131, § 40; 310 Code Mass. Regs. § 10.02(2)(b).) <br />Because part of Brockton Power's project would fall within a buffer zone, <br />Brockton Power filed an NOI with Brockton's Conservation Commission (the <br />"Comrission").Brockton Power also applied to the state Department of Pub- <br />lic Utilities ("DPU") for an exemption from the City's relevant zoning restric- <br />tions, pursuant to Massachusetts statutory law —Mass. Gen. L. c. 40A, § 3. <br />That statute provides that public service corporations may seek and obtain <br />from the DPU exemption from the zoning ordinance or by-law "reasonably <br />necessary for the convenience or welfare of the public." <br />The Commission, in addressing Brockton Power's NOI, denied Brockton <br />Power's request for approval of the project. Among other things, the Commis- <br />sion found that Brockton Power failed to apply for local zoning approvals as <br />required by state regulations-310 Code Mass. Regs. § 10.05(4)(e)-(f). Those <br />regulations provide that, prior to filing an NOI, an applicant must apply for <br />"all permits, variances and approvals required by local bylaw with respect to <br />the proposed activity" that are "feasible to obtain." <br />Brockton Power appealed the Commission's decision to the state Depart- <br />ment of Environmental Protection's ("DEP") Bureau of Resource Protection <br />("BRP"). The BRP overruled the Commission's decision and issued a super- <br />seding order of conditions. <br />The Commission again appealed under DEP adjudicatory procedures. The <br />DEP upheld the superseding order of conditions. Among other things, the <br />DEP found that Brockton Power was not required to apply for or obtain site <br />plan approval from the local boards before filing an NOI with the Commission. <br />The DEP determined that Brockton Power's application for exemption from <br />©2012 Thomson Reuters 3 <br />