My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 11/06/2014 - Minutes - No Quorum
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 11/06/2014 - Minutes - No Quorum
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:31:34 PM
Creation date
4/29/2024 1:20:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Minutes - No Quorum
Document Date
11/06/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners VanScoy and Brauer. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Levine, Maul and Nosan. <br />5. PUBLIC HEARINGS/COMMISSION BUSINESS <br />5.01: Update on Ordinance #14-14 Amending City Code Section 117-118 Entitled The <br />COR Amending Minimum Floor Area Ratio and Maximum Parking Requirements <br />in The COR-1 Sub -District <br />Presentation <br />Community Development Director Gladhill presented the staff report stating the purpose of this <br />case is to review the status of Ordinance #14-14 amending City Code to lower the minimum Floor <br />Area Ratio from 0.75 to 0.65 in The COR-1 Sub -District. The Planning Commission requested <br />an opportunity to review the amendment after the City Council introduced the ordinance, but <br />before adoption. A key component of the request was to review additional visual materials to <br />better understand the concept of Floor Area Ratio. He provided the Commission with a detailed <br />presentation on the proposed land use densities for The COR. It was noted the Council has <br />directed staff to consider an ordinance that would lower minimum density requirements in the <br />COR-1 Sub -District and study how this amendment would impact the remainder of the future <br />development of The COR, while still generally preserving the vision of the Development Plan. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked for clarification on how the City would reach the three desired <br />outcomes within the policy change. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill explained it was unlikely the City would achieve the <br />vision of a parking ramp without public subsidy. He indicated the Metropolitan Council could be <br />approached to assist with the original vision. <br />Commissioner VanScoy questioned what the City would do if it did not meet the Metropolitan <br />Council density goals. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill indicated the goals would need to be reevaluated <br />along with the household forecasts. <br />Commissioner VanScoy inquired if the priority for the City was to have residential density. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill commented that as a matter of policy the City was <br />hoping to develop The COR-1 with high quality mixed uses. <br />Commissioner VanScoy went on record stating he opposed the proposed change as he feared how <br />it would impact the entire COR. He recommended that the entire COR be evaluated before a <br />policy decision was made. <br />Planning Commission/November 6, 2014 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.