Laserfiche WebLink
SENIOR DOUSING <br /> (#>PARTNERS10 0 prebyterian <br /> I rE n1 (tlrml 11 � Ii%: -% homes & services <br /> Entitlement Application Narrative <br /> Through concentrating density on the south side of the site,the proposal is able to incorporate robust density <br /> transitioning to create a density that is at or below the surroundings to the west and the north as well as <br /> incorporate park like elements for the community. The proposal takes screening very seriously and uses the <br /> existing trees as a buffer on the north and west where they exist. This will create a natural screening that is <br /> consistent with Section 475 in the Ramsey City Code. The proposal features a park-like campus that is both <br /> set apart from neighboring buildings and is intentional. HVAC units will be screened as well to maximize <br /> curb appeal, create a cohesive campus, and hide back of house areas. <br /> Parks <br /> Presbyterian Homes & Services proposes to expand solstice park including two pickleball courts on the <br /> northwest side of the site. This should bolster and expand Solstice Park.Additionally,it is proposed to add <br /> parking for Solstice Park improving a neighborhood park for the long term. <br /> Traffic <br /> Presbyterian Homes & Services proactively commissioned a traffic study conducted by Kimley-Horn. <br /> There is additional discussion anticipated with the City of Ramsey and Anoka County with regard to site <br /> access. <br /> The proposal seeks to minimize traffic. It may go without saying, but residents of seniors housing take <br /> fewer trips than the residents of a single-family home (3.2 trips per day vs. 9.5 trips per day according to <br /> the Institute of Transportation Engineers I Ith Edition). Seniors in single family homes take an estimated <br /> 4.5 trips per day. The 180 combined units of seniors generate materially fewer trips than a similar all age <br /> development. For that reason,the proposal with its 180 senior units actually generates an anticipated 7.1% <br /> fewer trips than what could be built in the current zoning.These fewer trips should correspond to less traffic <br /> than what could be built by right on the site. <br /> Current Zoning Proposed Zoning <br /> Land Use Description ITE#- Daily Trips/Unit Units Daily Trips Units Daily Trips Daily Trip Var. <br /> Single Family Detatched Housing 210 20 189 0 0 <br /> Multi-Family Housing(Low Rise) 220 btu.'. 84 566 0 0 <br /> Multi-Fa mily Housi n g(Mid-Rise) 221 4.5 278 1,262 280 1,271 <br /> Senior Adu It Housing-Single Family 251 4.3. 0 0 20 86 <br /> Senior Adult Housing-Multi-Family 252 0 0 160 518 <br /> Total 382 2,017 460 1,875 -7.1% <br /> I <br /> Note <br /> *Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)Trip Generation Manual,11th Edition. <br /> Page 8 of 11 <br />