Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Manager Larson presented the staff report stating that staff recommends approval of the <br />Haviland Fields development proposal. Staff received many letters and emails from residents <br />which have been provided to the Commission. <br />Citizen Innut <br />Councilmember Woestehoff commented that the City Council actually reviewed the EAW twice, <br />asking for additional information on traffic after the first review. He noted that the approved EAW <br />has been posted on the City website. <br />Sam Jagodzinski, representing the applicant, echoed the comments from the staff report. He stated <br />that they are working with a host of partners who are great at what they do and introduced some <br />of the members present tonight. He stated that they want the development to look intentional with <br />the density transitioning to the south, away from the adjoining residential homes. He provided a <br />recap of the proposal, noting that the existing Lord of Life Church would remain the focus of the <br />site with complimentary uses proposed to be added. He acknowledged the different approvals that <br />would be needed for this development to move forward and reviewed the process thus far which <br />began in 2022. He recapped how the input received from the public, Commission and City Council <br />has helped to guide the development of their plans. He noted that a PUD is being required but <br />they do meet the standards of R-3 zoning with the exception of the density calculation because of <br />the items (including the church property) that must not be included in the overall site calculation. <br />Chris Palkowitsch, BKV Architects, commented that staff did a thorough job presenting the <br />request. He noted that the intent of the design was to create a park -based campus, focusing on the <br />natural environment and the church. He felt that with the amount of wetlands preserved and the <br />church space, the density will not be as condensed as it would seem in the calculation. He <br />explained how the team worked together to incorporate the feedback from the residents, noting <br />that park homes adjacent to the single-family homes and moving the density to the south. <br />Michael Rice, 14620 Flourine Street NW, commented that this property backs to the Lord of Life <br />property. He stated that he moved to this area to have a low, calm life. He stated that his main <br />concern is the additional burden that this would place on the schools. He believed that the issues <br />with the schools should be addressed before adding more families to this area. <br />James Berreau, 14641 Flourine Street, commented that his backyard also overlooks the firepit for <br />Lord of Life Church. He did not think the senior building should be in that location. He stated <br />that many of his concerns are related to traffic, commenting on the gross negligence of the first <br />traffic study that was done. He commented that any data obtained from that study should be <br />considered null and void and believed that traffic counts estimated were significantly <br />underestimated. He commented that for his street it takes about three to four minutes to get out of <br />the neighborhood when school is in session. He believed that at minimum there should also be an <br />exit from this property directly onto 47. <br />Chad Lindgren, 5561 145th Circle NW, commented that he believes that bringing in more residents <br />will help ease the burden through increased tax base. He commented that the development looks <br />fine, but his concern is with traffic. He noted a previous development concept which required a <br />Planning Commission/ March 28, 2024 <br />Page 7 of 13 <br />