Laserfiche WebLink
•We do not have a high need for that space for our own office/personnel needs. Future extensions are to be <br /> mutually agreed to, allowing for regular options to consider our own space needs at timely intervals. <br /> •Operating expenses on the shared space do not drastically change without the occupancy of the License <br /> Center. However,the license center does generate many visitors daily. <br /> •Adjusting License Center signage is a reasonable request. <br /> •Completing a flooring upgrade is a reasonable request knowing the current condition. Similarly, improving <br /> safety changes is in line with what we are considering in other areas of City Hall for our staff. The <br /> handicap door opener is not required,but does provide a good customer service gesture. <br /> •The proposed base rent reduction to $14.00/SF is significantly under market rate. <br /> •Current CAM Seems to be in the market range (lower side) <br /> Options <br /> 1. Leave lease as is. <br /> •Pros- The financial terms remain as is for the next year. <br /> • Cons- The future remains uncertain, and they may choose to terminate the lease on June 30, 2025 or after <br /> the final five-year extension. <br /> 2. Accept the proposed amendments. <br /> •Pros-Increases the likelihood of a long-term agreement and revenue source. This would maintain a <br /> service option within the city for our residents and business community. Utilizes excess space within City <br /> Hall that we do not have a high need for. <br /> • Cons- Reduces revenue now and in the future with smaller escalators tied to future increases. They may <br /> still choose to terminate the lease in the future. <br /> 3. Counter offer the proposed amendment to reflect current market conditions. <br /> •Pros- The financial terms would be consistent with market rate, and if accepted, increase annual revenue. <br /> • Cons- The future remains uncertain, and they may choose to terminate the lease on June 30, 2025 or after <br /> the final five-year extension. <br /> 4. Counter offer the proposed amendment to reduce financial terms. <br /> •Pros-Largely the same as accepting the County's proposal,but does not reduce the annual revenue as <br /> much. <br /> • Cons- The future remains uncertain, and they may choose to terminate the lease on June 30, 2025 or after <br /> the final five-year extension. <br /> At this point in time, staff does not hold a firm recommendation. <br /> Timeframe: <br /> Funding Source: <br /> Responsible Party(ies): <br /> Brian Hagen, City Administrator <br /> Outcome: <br /> Provide consensus direction on support for a lease amendment and the terms for the Anoka County License <br /> Center. <br /> Attachments <br /> Master Contract <br /> 2nd Five-Year Extension Letter <br /> Form Review <br /> Inbox Reviewed By Date <br /> Brian Hagen Brian Hagen 05/07/2024 10:59 PM <br />