My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 10/19/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2021
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 10/19/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:35:01 AM
Creation date
5/23/2024 10:46:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
10/19/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9.1 c Public— Private Partnership <br /> A public-private partnership, also called a P3, is a cooperative agreement between a private company <br /> and a unit of government to provide a service. There are community water and wastewater facilities <br /> across the U.S. that are based on a public-private partnership, ranging from large design-build-operate <br /> projects to shared functions such as administration and billing. There is flexibility in the roles and <br /> responsibilities of the public and private partners. <br /> 9.1 d Privatization <br /> In a completely privatized model, a corporation owns and operates the utility and in context of this <br /> study, is the water service provider for a municipality or group of municipalities. Privatization of drinking <br /> water service transfers all ownership, operations, and management responsibilities to a private entity. <br /> Municipalities may sell their existing water utility to a private entity, or elect to fund the construction of a <br /> new utility owned by a private entity. In this model, the role of the municipal government(s) is to <br /> establish policies and provide oversight in addition to the oversight and regulation administered by the <br /> state. <br /> 9.1 a Application for Northwest Metro Communities <br /> For the purposes of evaluating cost sharing strategies, this study assumes that the governance <br /> structure for a Northwest Metro regional water system will be an independent Joint Utility. At this <br /> concept level, a Joint Utility structure provides a clear demarcation of shared facilities and associated <br /> costs for the member communities. With continued planning and development of regional system <br /> features, the questions associated with governance structure and the related funding of the system will <br /> evolve and can be explored in more detail. <br /> 9.2 Cost Sharing <br /> A simple cost sharing strategy was applied to the concept level system developed for a Northwest Area <br /> regional surface water supply system (Approach 1). This is meant to serve as an example and only <br /> extends through 2040. <br /> 9.2a Funding <br /> The funding sources available include: <br /> • WAC (the joint utility receives a portion of WAC for each new connection) <br /> • Lateral Benefit (assessment already considered in the capital costs) <br /> • Trunk Charges <br /> • State/Federal Grants <br /> • PFA Loan <br /> • Water Rates <br /> 9.2b Concept System Features <br /> The features of the concept regional surface water system for this cost sharing example include: <br /> • Phase Al B, C Trunk Watermain <br /> — 36" pipeline meeting 2040 demands for all communities <br /> — Pump stations/storage to meet 2040 demand for all communities <br /> • 25 MGD surface WTP— meeting 2040 demand <br /> 9.2c Cost of Service <br /> To estimate the water rates that a regional utility would charge for the concept system defined in this <br /> example, the following assumptions apply: <br /> • WAC <br /> — 20,100 additional WAC by 2040 <br /> Page—39 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.