Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 10 — Summary of Findings and Implementation Considerations <br /> Key takeaways from this concept level study of alternative approaches to a Northwest Metro area <br /> regional drinking water supply system include: <br /> • The average day water demand in the Northwest Metro is projected to increase from 3.3 MGD in <br /> 2015 to 7.8 MGD in 2040 (140% increase). <br /> • The ultimate average day water demand in the Northwest Metro is 29 MGD (approximately 800% <br /> increase from 2015). <br /> • If the Northwest Metro cities continue to utilize only groundwater to meet water demands, an <br /> additional 54 wells will likely be needed to meet ultimate demands. A 2016 MCES report indicated <br /> drawdown in the Tunnel City-Wonewoc aquifer in 2040 when demands are only 27% of the ultimate <br /> demands. It is possible that the aquifer cannot sustain the ultimate demands of the Northwest <br /> Metro. <br /> • The Mississippi River has sufficient water quantity to serve the Northwest Metro communities. The <br /> water quality in the Mississippi River appears to be acceptable for a conventional surface water <br /> treatment plant. St. Could, St. Paul, and Minneapolis utilize the Mississippi River as their source of <br /> drinking water. <br /> • A regional surface WTP has the advantages of being a cost effective approach, eliminates the need <br /> for numerous addition wells, increases groundwater sustainability, provides fully softened water, <br /> and reduces chloride discharges to the Mississippi River. The disadvantages of a regional surface <br /> WTP is that it changes water taste and odor and relies heavily on one water source. <br /> • A regional lime-softening groundwater WTP has the advantages of providing fully softened water <br /> and reduces chloride discharges to the Mississippi River. The disadvantages of a regional lime <br /> softening groundwater WTP is that it is one of the most expensive approaches evaluated, may not <br /> be feasible due to groundwater drawdown, and relies heavily on one water source. <br /> • A regional conjunctive use WTP has the advantages of being a cost effective approach, increases <br /> groundwater sustainability, provides mostly softened water, reduces chloride discharges to the <br /> Mississippi River, and does not rely on one water source. The disadvantages of a regional <br /> conjunctive use WTP is that it changes water taste and odor and does not provide fully softened <br /> water in the summer. <br /> • Constructing individual lime softening groundwater WTPs (Status Quo) has the advantages of <br /> providing fully softened water and reduces chloride discharges to the Mississippi River. The <br /> disadvantages of individual lime softening WTPs is that it is the most expensive approach and relies <br /> on one water source. <br /> • A cost of service example indicates that grant funding will be an integral part of implementing a <br /> regional surface water supply system to make the project viable. <br /> • In the absence of a project driver, Northwest Metro cities are likely to continue to utilize <br /> groundwater and construct iron and manganese removal water treatment plants. At this point, none <br /> of the Northwest Metro cities have water treatment plants, although 2 are in the planning stages <br /> (Ramsey and Corcoran). <br /> • The Northwest Metro communities are embarking on this study at an optimal time. The water <br /> systems are not fully developed and significant growth is planned. <br /> Page—41 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL <br />