Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Councilmember Howell, seconded by Councilmember Specht, to Adopt Resolution <br /> 921-023 Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisements for Bid for 2021 <br /> Crack Seal Improvements, Improvement Project#21-06. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Howell, Specht, Musgrove, Riley, <br /> and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. <br /> 7.04: Introduce ordinance #21-01 Amending City Code Sections 117-111 (R-1 Residential <br /> District)and 117-112 (R-2 Residential District)Clarifying Sub-Districts Based on Lot <br /> Size <br /> Deputy City Administrator Gladhill reviewed the staff report and recommendation of the Planning <br /> Commission to adopt ordinance 421-01. <br /> Councilmember Riley asked for additional information as this would appear to move 50 foot lots <br /> from R-2 to R-1. <br /> Deputy City Administrator Gladhill replied that the Council would still dictate where the <br /> subdistrict would go through rezoning. He stated that staff was finding that the 50-foot-wide lots <br /> were not reaching the density range in R-2 and therefore it better fits in the density allowed in R- <br /> 1. He confirmed that the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this issue and <br /> recommended approval. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked the difference between R-1-1 and R-1-3. <br /> Deputy City Administrator Gladhill recognized that there was a typo noting that it should state <br /> MUSH-80, MUSA-65, and MUSA-50. He stated that staff would make that correction before the <br /> ordinance comes back for adoption. He stated that by default, R-1 would remain at 80-foot-wide <br /> lots and if something less is requested, the developer would still need to go through a rezoning <br /> request. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove stated that this references residential MUSA areas and asked if there <br /> are areas outside of that. <br /> Deputy City Administrator Gladhill confirmed that there are other areas outside of residential <br /> MUSA that would remain unchanged. <br /> Councilmember Specht asked if this change would make it easier for developers to request this <br /> smaller lot size. <br /> Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that this change would not impact the City's ability to <br /> remain more restrictive, it simply provides another tool in the box for the City. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff commented that this change would clean up the zoning map and <br /> would not change anything. He noted that R-1 would become all single family, R-2 would be <br /> City Council 1 January 26, 2021 <br /> Page 7 of 13 <br />