Laserfiche WebLink
Deputy City Administrator Gladhill confirmed that staff would welcome additional time for <br /> review. He stated that the Council could postpone this discussion and forward this to a future <br /> worksession. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Riley, seconded by Councilmember Musgrove,to postpone ordinance <br /> #21-02 Amending City Code Section 117-148 Entitled Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area <br /> and forward it to a future worksession. <br /> Further discussion: Councilmember Specht asked if postponing this action would impact the <br /> Riverstone South development. Deputy City Administrator Gladhill provided an update on the <br /> case on tonight's agenda and noted that action could still occur tonight. He stated that there is <br /> additional time before the Council reviews the Preliminary Plat. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Riley, Musgrove, Howell, and <br /> Specht. Voting No: Councilmember Woestehoff. <br /> 7.06: Receive Request from Planning Commission to Reconsider Bowers Drive Connection <br /> Planning Commissioner Randy Bauer reviewed the staff report and stated that upon a vote of 3-2, <br /> the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council reconsider the connection to Bowers <br /> Drive, at some form, for public safety reasons. He asked for input from members of public safety <br /> and/or public works related to their concerns for not having a second access on Bowers Drive <br /> because that was the driving force behind the Planning Commission recommendation. <br /> Police Chief Katers replied that public safety has been consistent in their recommendations for <br /> access. He stated that for police, two accesses are better than one and connection between <br /> neighborhoods is good. He believed that fire also requires adequate turning radius and dedication <br /> of fire access roads. He commented that for public works it is easier to plow a through street rather <br /> than a dead end. He stated that he fully understands that this is a nonconforming existing <br /> residential neighborhood and that the residents are opposed to this connection. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove stated that she appreciates the concern from the members of the <br /> Planning Commission,but when this previously came forward to the City Council through a public <br /> hearing,the Council agreed that the development should move forward without that second access. <br /> She asked how many Bowers Drive residents are aware that this is up for discussion tonight,noting <br /> that she would hate to make a decision on this without allowing those residents to again provide <br /> input. She commented that her position on this issue has not changed. <br /> Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that the steps prior to this point have been concept <br /> planning and setup for Preliminary Plat review. He stated that the Planning Commission held the <br /> full public hearing and its last review of the project, therefore the Commission can make that <br /> recommendation as they are a recommending body. He stated that staff did not choose to notify <br /> the public for this discussion. He stated that if the decision of the Council changes, the residents <br /> would again be notified for the next review. He stated that if the Council chooses to take no action <br /> and move forward without that additional connection,that would be fine. <br /> City Council/January 26, 2021 <br /> Page 9 of 13 <br />