Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION #24-142 <br />RESOLUTION REQUESTING 2024 GENERAL ELECTION POST -ELECTION <br />REVIEW <br />WHEREAS, the City council of the City of Ramsey desires to have a Post -Election <br />Review (PER) conducted on the results of six of its precincts for the 2024 general election pursuant <br />to Minnesota Statute 206.89; and <br />WHEREAS, PER are conducted for precincts that must be chosen by lot by the Anoka <br />County Canvassing Board, but there is not a limit on the number of lot selections that may be <br />performed and there is not a restriction on establishing the lot from which the selection is made; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, a PER is required to include counting the votes for President or Governor, <br />United States Senator, and United State Representative; and the county -appointed post -election <br />review official may conduct a PER of votes cast for additional offices; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council desires to have a PER performed for six of its precincts and <br />to include all offices for which there is more than one candidate but exclude all judicial offices. <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1. In the event a Ramsey election precinct is selected for a Post -Election Review (PER) of <br />the 2024 general election, the City Council requests that the Anoka County Canvassing <br />Board perform a second lot selection that includes only the other eight precincts in Oak <br />Grove and select five additional precincts. <br />2. In the event a Ramsey election precinct is not selected for a PER of the 2024 general <br />election, the City Council request that the Anoka County Canvassing Board perform a <br />second lot selections that includes only the nine precincts in Ramsey and selects six <br />precincts. <br />3. The City Council request that any PER of a Ramsey precinct include a review of the results <br />of all state, county, and city offices, except judicial races, that include more than one <br />candidate. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />