Laserfiche WebLink
CASE <br /> <br />DISCUSSION OF TRAFFIC CONCERNS IN THE ELMCREST PARK AREA <br /> By: Steven Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Within the past several months the City has received complaints relating to outside traffic <br />using neighborhood streets to access Elmcrest Park where increased park activity has <br />generated additional traffic. Notification that this topic was to be discussed at this <br />meeting was mailed to individual property owners. A copy of a letter notifying these <br />residents is attached to this case. <br /> <br />Although the main vehicular access point to Elmcrest Park is from Quicksilver onto 167th <br />Avenue, the park has a public access to the neighborhood to the west at 163rd Lane. The <br />design of the parking lot allows park traffic to enter and leave through either of these <br />access points. Increased use of the park has caused the neighborhood to note an increase <br />in the neighborhood traffic. To better define the traffic counts were taken on four separate <br />dates between June 6 and June 12, 2005. The results are illustrated on the attached figure <br />entitled Elmcrest Park Area Traffic Counts. Excluding Friday when there are no <br />organized league activities in the park, these figure shows that the park generated an <br />average of 785 trips daily and that roughly 73% of the trips are using the Quicksilver <br />access and 27% the 165tnLane access. The number of trips generated by the park through <br />the neighborhood ranged fi.om 54 trips on Friday to 248 trips on Monday with an average <br />of 138 trips using the 164Lane access. This traffic appears to use multiple routes for <br />exiting the neighborhood. The traffic counts on the streets surveyed are within the range <br />expected on residential streets. <br /> <br />One possible mitigation measure might be the posting of a "No Exit" sign at the west <br />entrance of the park prohibiting westbound traffic onto 163rd Lane. This should realize a <br />50% reduction in the traffic through the neighborhood. In fact, it may produce an <br />additional reduction as park users will become acquainted with the Quicksilver access. <br />However, there may also be negative consequences associated with this action. Residents <br />fi.om the west neighborhood would be forced to drive several miles to return home when <br />their residence may be only a short distance away. The enforcement of the restriction <br />may also be difficult and will prompt resident calls to the police department for <br />enforcement action. This would also increase traffic pressure on the 167th Avenue access <br />which could be particularly problematic at the end of league games when incoming and <br />exiting traffic becomes concentrated. Pursuing additional access points for the park may <br />be a preferable alternative. <br /> <br />The posting of a stop sign at the west exit for the park at Uranium Street may also be <br />considered. This would be consistent with the posting of like stop signs at other <br />community park exits onto the feeding City streets. This would provide some measure of <br />protection for pedestrians in the vicinity of this intersection, particularly at the end of <br />league games. <br /> <br /> <br />