Laserfiche WebLink
Citizen Input <br /> <br />There was none, <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Van Scoy, to close the public hearing. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Van Scoy, Brauer, Cleveland, <br />Hunt, Levine, and Trites Kolle. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />The public hearing closed at 7:25 p.m. <br /> <br /> Commission Business <br /> Chairperson Nixt called the regular meeting to, order at 7:25 <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt inquired if the general feeling of t~~ Chmniission is in fa~¢~ St;the request to <br /> <br /> The consensus of the Commlssmn was agreement of the rezonmg ~:;..:.-: [ :: ::? <br /> <br /> Comm~ssmner Tntes Rolle noted the suggested use ~vould'provlde a posture transition with a <br /> nice quiet use from the golf course the 1/~0a{~ that ~: ~1i~ ~e=away. <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt noted if the Comprehensive Plan ~s amended to Places to Work, a rezonmg w~ll <br /> be reqmred as well. The Comprehensxve pian:~ould, pe~¥that zomng classificatmn under the <br /> code and the types of uses .that :would go w~thlthag h0~ever, what has been presented is the <br /> potentml use, not the actual use for ~he site. ~,~- <br /> <br /> Associate Planner Geisler exp~airied tki~Comprehensive Plan amendment would be a land use <br /> change, an~t doe~no~ hst-spec~fic usesk She re~lewed typmal uses for Places to Work hsted m the <br /> Com~hSi~2~ [nal~3ing busi/~i~:~fid ;~rofessional office, showrooms, light industrial, <br /> and pnblm:works fac~lt~es~ ,:,~ ~ :q~' <br /> <br />Ch~r~on Nixt suggesteff denial, of the amendment request, while making it clear that the <br />comunsston is m favor of the_amendment ffthe apphcant comes forward wath a she plan for the <br />planned ~se::~%~ <br /> <br /> Associate Plm~nertG~isle~. i~di~[ted Mr. Peterson has spoken with Norttffork and they are in <br /> favor of the p;;P~s¢{us~ §tlc explained staff recommended Mr. Peterson proceed this way ~o <br /> get an indication from: the::Planning Commission regarding their idea about this proposed land <br /> use change before he ~P~:~ds significant dollars on a site plan. She reviewed the allowed uses <br /> under E-1 zoning, including manufacturing research labs, testing labs, office, multi-tenant <br /> facilities, truck terminals, and warehousing. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Van Scoy, seconded by Commissioner Brauer, to recommend that the <br />City Council deny the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment based on the inability to <br /> Planning Commission/June 1, 2006 <br /> Page 12 of 19 <br /> -201- <br /> <br /> <br />