Laserfiche WebLink
4, That the Sub, oct Property is currently zoned R-2 Medium Density Residential. <br /> <br />That the applicant is proposing a development that is compatible with the Comprehensive <br />plan designation of this property by providing denser housing on the County Road, but <br />remaining sensitive to the existing single family and the market demand for detached, <br />association-maintained living. <br /> <br />6. That the Applicant is proposing to develop the plat v~th a wic[~?ira~., ge of housing types, <br /> price ranges and styles. The development will mchide detached tox/mhomes, and cannot <br /> meet the R-1 standards or the R-2 standards with th~s..propos~d bmldmg style and the <br /> confines of the lot configuration. <br /> <br />7. That the applicant is proposing to provide essent!?r~i::'cm:inection}. <br />8. That the proposal be will be consistent with alt: 6'ther applicable City and Stat~'~gulations <br /> <br />9. That the proposal will/will not be detrimental on s~Si/~ing market values. <br /> <br /> 10. That the proposal mil/will not be a 5,~i.]~ ~o the Commui~fi3 as a~whole. <br /> <br /> 11. That the proposal v~ll/wll not impose'bndue burd..e.~ upon p..ubhc services and facilities. <br /> <br /> 12. That the proposed wdEwiI~ not be detrimental to future land uses m the surrounding area. <br /> <br />The motion for th~.~/dblStion of thk-'.foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> , and uponv?te bemgtaken thereon~ the following voted m favor thereof'. <br /> <br />and ~e.[otlowmg voted against the same:' <br /> <br />and the following abstained>':" <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted by the Ramsey City Council <br />this the __ day of__ 2006. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #06-06- <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />-243- <br /> <br /> <br />