Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission <br />Meeting Date: 06/27/2024 <br />Primary Strategic Plan Initiative: <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Public Hearing - Zoning Code Updates <br />6. 4. <br />Purpose/Background: <br />When the new Zoning Code was adopted last year, it capped off a major re -write of the zoning regulations for the <br />community. As it has been in practice for six months, staff has noted some things that need clarification or <br />correction. Chapter 106 has been found to have some misspelled words, incorrect section references, and some <br />formatting issues. Staff has been working with our legal publisher to fix these issues. The substantive changes, <br />however, require the adoption of an ordinance to fix. Below is an explanation of the proposed changes. <br />Section 106-202 - Required sureties and financial guarantees <br />When a newly -constructed house is completed in the winter months, it is common for the landscaping and <br />driveways not to be installed due to weather. Staff cannot prevent occupancy of the home due to those site items <br />not being in place, but we can collect an escrow guaranteeing they'll be installed when the weather improves. <br />The landscaping escrow was inserted into Code, but the driveway escrow was inadvertently left out. Many times, <br />only one of the two escrows are needed, hence the separate sections. <br />Section 106-236 - Home occupation permits (procedures) and 106-425. -Performance Standards (home <br />occupations <br />In these two sections, it was unclear which HOP needed Planning Commission and City Council review (Type -II) <br />and which did not (Type -I). There were several references to "interim use" from when it was proposed to have <br />HOPS as a subset to interim uses. It was later determined that it made sense to split the home occupations apart <br />from interim uses and not all of the subsections were updated. <br />Section 106-310 - Lighting <br />Three different concepts are proposed to be modified: First, what was adopted noted residential zoned property. <br />The intent was for shorter light poles near residential uses. The adopted text left out PUDs and mixed -use zoning <br />(COR). Second, the height of 20 feet for freestanding poles was used with the Hilton Home2Suites project next to <br />Northart Ramsey Apartments, so that height was used instead of the adopted 15 feet. Third, there was confusion <br />about how a shared parking lot or driveway that has a property line running though should be treated as strict <br />interpretation would require dimmer light levels along that line. <br />Section 106-331 - Wind energy conversion systems (WECS) <br />The adopted ordinance only allows for smaller, household -sized systems to be reviewed administratively, similar <br />to how household -scale solar is reviewed via a building permit. A clause stating that the City Council can deny a <br />project based on architectural integration was carried over from the old Zoning Code and should be updated for <br />the adopted review procedures to include the zoning administrator instead. <br />Section 106-422 -Accessory Uses (Residential <br />Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) are allowed in most of the residential districts. Two of the single-family <br />districts are shown as prohibited (R-1B and R-1C). The performance standards require a minimum lot width of <br />80 feet for an attached ADU and one acre for a detached ADU. The minimum lot width and area in these two <br />districts are smaller than what is required, but it is possible for larger lots to comply with the standards. <br />