Laserfiche WebLink
and if the business sells this land then things can change. She explained that if the land is all in one <br />city or the other it makes it better for the access point and better for a business proposition to the <br />owners as well if they were to sell this property down the line. She said she would like to work <br />with the property owner on a compromise rather than giving the land to Elk River. <br />Councilmember Howell said it would be nice to annex the Elk River portion to Ramsey. <br />The applicant asked if they are going to allow him to run his outdoor storage business on the <br />Ramsey portion. <br />Mayor Kuzma said they will have to work through this with Staff to see what they can <br />accommodate. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff noted that they need to fully understand what the requirement for this <br />land is. He reiterated that there are tools that they can use to zone the property to allow the use. He <br />said that the Council and Staff need to know what all this business will require on the land, so they <br />can work through this. <br />The applicant shared that he spoke with Planning Manager Todd Larson on this, and he said that <br />there is no chance for them to operate this kind of business on Ramsey land which is why they are <br />wanting to annex to Elk River. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff explained that there is no chance they can run the business on the land <br />with the current zoning; however, the Council can make decisions on ways that they can change <br />zoning or the rules to make this an allowed use. <br />The consensus of the Council was to direct Staff to try to work towards a compromise to keep this <br />land in Ramsey but make it so the property owner can still operate his business on the property. <br />2.02: Continue Discussions Regarding Proposed Updates to the Personnel Policy <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher continued her review of the personnel policy updates, <br />discussing Section 11, the Use of City Property. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff noted that the section added to 11.2 that addresses returning <br />voicemails within one business day does not seem to belong in this section as it is more behavioral <br />than reliant on technology. He noted that it has always been a frustration for him that <br />Councilmembers get voicemail boxes, but they have to call out on their personal cell phone. He <br />noted that they all take on a liability by using their personal phone numbers. He suggested adding <br />some language that states that personal phones may be used for City business. <br />Councilmember Musgrove agreed that the section added to 11.2 has more to do with behavior <br />rather than technology. <br />City Council Work Session / June 11, 2024 <br />Page 4 of 10 <br />