Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 1 <br /> F <br /> Senior Planner Anderson replied that overall,on the site there would be enough space to adequately <br /> fit five additional trees,noting that they would not all have to go along Xkimo Street. He believed <br /> that three trees could fit along Xkimo and the other two on the front side of the site. <br /> Board Member Fetterley asked if there would be fencing along the backside of the property and <br /> 47. <br /> Senior Planner Anderson replied that the fencing would go along the eastern side of the building <br /> to screen those parking stalls with a gate, which will separate the parking lot between customer <br /> parkin and vehicles awaiting service. <br /> g g � <br /> Board Member Fetterley asked if there would be transitioning required to the north. `` <br /> s <br /> Senior Planner Anderson replied that the property to the north is an office building and not <br /> residential,therefore it would not require transit ioning. <br /> Board Member Hagerty asked if there something that would prevent long-term storage of vehicles. <br /> i <br /> Senior Planner Anderson replied that condition could be added under the Conditional Use Permit <br /> (CUP), but generally speaking there could be a requirement that inoperable vehicles are stored <br /> inside the building. He noted that the Planning Commission would address that when it holds the <br /> public hearing. <br /> Board Member Bernard commented that the fenced area could be used for that purpose as well, <br /> which would block those from view. V. <br /> Chairperson Moore commented on the difficulty in getting onto 47 from that intersection and asked <br /> if there is a future plan for a traffic control change at that intersection. <br /> Senior Planner Anderson replied that currently there is a right-in/right-out for that intersection. He <br /> stated that traffic cannot go southbound on 47 from 142na and would instead travel on Xkimo to <br /> the stoplight which would allow access onto 47. He stated that there would be no changes proposed <br /> to the intersection for 47 and 142nd. <br /> f <br /> Motion by Board Member Salami and seconded by Board Member Bernard to recommend <br /> approval of the Landscape Plan, contingent upon compliance with staff s review comments. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Moore,Board Member Salami, Bernard, Fetterley, and Ix <br /> Hagerty. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Heifner and Vikander. <br /> 5.03: Consider Natural Resources Aspects of a Site Plan and Final Plat for The Catholic <br /> Church of Saint Katharine Drexel 103 •No. 24- =(Project �s Case of Sant Katherine <br /> Drexel <br /> Senior Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He stated that the City has received an <br /> application from the Catholic Church of Saint Katharine Drexel for Site Plan review and Final Plat <br /> for a new church to be constructed at the northwest corner of 1515'Avenue and Variolite Street. <br /> Environmental Policy Board 1 March 18, 2024 <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> fm <br />