Laserfiche WebLink
8. 2. <br /> CC Regular Session New <br /> Meeting Date: 07/23/2024 <br /> PrimaryStrategic Plan Initiative: Create a positive image for residential neighborhoods,business districts and key <br /> g corridors. <br /> Title: <br /> Driveway Setback Discussion <br /> Purpose/Background: <br /> This case was requested by Councilmembers Howell and Musgrove. <br /> In summer 2023, code complaints were filed with the Code Enforcement Officer against eight(8)properties, in <br /> which expansions to the existing driveways had been constructed that did not comply with city code setback <br /> requirements. City Code Section 106-463 regulates residential driveways to be setback at least five feet from <br /> interior side or rear lot lines. Some of the driveway expansions abut up to the interior side (side yard). There are <br /> instances in which the driveway expansions are new(within the last year) and others that have existed 10+years. <br /> Up until 2023, a driveway permit was required to expand a driveway. This permit requirement had been in code <br /> since, at least,the early 1990s; it was to ensure the location and setbacks met the city code. The permit is no <br /> longer a requirement. <br /> The Code Enforcement Officer is required to enforce zoning regulations; therefore,he began the code <br /> enforcement process. To date,two (2)property owners have applied for variances, in which public hearings will <br /> be held at the Planning Commission meeting on July 25, 2024. One (1)property owner modified the driveway to <br /> meet the five (5) foot setback required by city code and one (1)property owner has been working with staff, <br /> Councilmember Specht and Councilmember Howell to apply for a variance. Four(4)property owners have yet <br /> to be notified of the noncompliant setbacks. After discussions with staff and Councilmembers Specht and Howell, <br /> it was determined to bring the discussion to the City Council as a whole. Discussion is to include the following: <br /> 1. Is there a way to allow for a setback encroachment on a driveway if the neighboring property owner agrees to <br /> it? <br /> 2. Should the setback be amended to allow driveways to the property line or modify the setback to be closer than <br /> five (5) feet? <br /> The majority of all properties have drainage and utility easements around the entire property. In the case of newer <br /> developments, a five(5) foot easement along the side yards is common. Typically,the easements are graded to <br /> catch the water runoff from the properties. It is not a large quantity of water filling the easements; however, it <br /> ensures the water stays on the property where it originated, as this is a requirement of the city code. Also, it <br /> provides space for snow removal from the hard surface driveways and ensures encroachments of vehicles and <br /> materials do not cross property lines. There are instances in which easements are used to move large quantities of <br /> water or utilities are located within the easements. In those cases, structures are not allowed. <br /> At some point in the 1990's,the setback from the interior side and rear property line changed from three (3) feet to <br /> five (5) feet. As part of the 2023 zoning code updates, staff raised the question to the Planning Commission about <br /> changing the setback to three (3) feet. At that time,the Commission did not support the change. City Council <br /> could direct staff to bring a discussion to the Planning Commission regarding amending the setback to something <br /> less than five(5) feet. <br /> The question was asked by Councilmember Howell about allowing for some type of permit if the neighboring <br /> property agrees to the encroachment. This could be a way to remedy the situation. However, staff have concerns <br />