Laserfiche WebLink
Staffs recommendation is that the supplied practical difficulties used to justify the variance for the lean-to <br />structure are not reasonable and the variance should be denied. The siding material is not consistent with the <br />applicant's siding nor other siding in the neighborhood. It is not an approved architectural material for homes. It <br />can be found as deck and fencing material. Should the walls be removed, an open -aired lean-to would appear <br />more in character of a residential property. However, if the property owner or the adjacent neighbor chose to build <br />a fence along the property line, the structure would immediately look out of place. Variances cannot restrict what <br />neighboring property owners do. Therefore, the variance for the structure should be denied. Staff is taking no <br />position on the concrete slab. <br />Outcome/Action: <br />Motion to direct staff to prepare a resolution... [pick one of the following] <br />1. ...approving the variance for a slab and lean-to structure based on the following practical difficulties: [insert <br />findings here]. <br />2. ...approving the variance for a slab and a roof -only lean-to structure based on the following practical <br />difficulties: [insert findings here]. <br />3. ...approving the variance for a slab only based on the following practical difficulties: [insert findings here]. <br />4. ...denying the variance for a slab and lean-to structure based on inadequate practical difficulties. <br />The resolution for the selected option will be brought back to the next Planning Commission and placed on the <br />consent agenda for adoption. <br />Location Map <br />Applicant's Narrative <br />Photos <br />Site Plan <br />NearMap Site Plan <br />Building Official's Memo <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Brian Hagen Brian Hagen 07/18/2024 02:28 PM <br />Form Started By: Todd Larson Started On: 07/17/2024 08:32 AM <br />Final Approval Date: 07/18/2024 <br />