My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/27/2024
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2024
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/27/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:58:42 AM
Creation date
8/1/2024 9:55:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/27/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion by Commissioner Bauer, seconded by Commissioner Heineman, to approve the consent <br />agenda as presented. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Gengler, Commissioners Bauer, Heineman, Anderson, <br />and VanScoy. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Hunt and Peters. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS/COMMISSION BUSINESS <br />6.01: Public Hearing: Consider a Conditional Use Permit for a Motor Fuel Station for Take <br />5 Oil Change at 7990 Sunwood Drive NW <br />Public Hearing <br />Chairperson Gengler called the public hearing to order at 7:01 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />City Planner Martin presented the staff report stating that staff recommends approval of the <br />Conditional Use Permit. <br />Citizen Innut <br />Ryan Burkman, Garage Holdings, provided a quick overview of the company operations and its <br />ownership group. He noted that while the company is somewhat new to the area, they are the third <br />largest oil change company in the U.S. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if the applicant considered placing the building on the site closer <br />to Armstrong. <br />Mr. Burkman commented that they considered both sites but preferred the front for the flow of <br />traffic and visibility. <br />Gary Gruber, Director of Construction for Garage Holdings, agreed with the comments of visibility <br />as many of their clients come on a drive by basis. He stated that the other building they would <br />propose will fit better with more parking on the rear site. <br />Commissioner Bauer recognized that the other building is not part of this request and asked if that <br />is speculative or whether there is a tenant. <br />Mr. Burkman commented that they have inclinations and are working to find a complimentary use <br />as soon as possible but do not yet have that use identified. <br />Commissioner Heineman asked for more information on the complimentary use. He stated that <br />he would like the use to be complimentary to the area rather than this specific use. <br />Planning Commission/ June 27, 2024 <br />Page 2 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.