Laserfiche WebLink
! <br /> <br />I$ <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Councilmcmb~cr Zimmerman inlroduccd the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #93-05-069 <br /> <br />RESOLUTe[ON APPROVING ABATEMENT OF CERTAIN SPECIAL <br />ASSESSMENTS CERTIFIED IN 1992 FOR THE CITY IMPROVEMENT <br />PROJECT ~9~-03, CITY FUND #435, COUNTY FUND #1942. <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the City's Improvement Project Number 91-03 is identified as Sealcoating <br />of Rum Acres Eslates 1st and 2nd Additions; and <br /> WHEREAS, prepayments were received by the City of Ramsey and reported to Anoka <br />County as f01]oWS: <br /> <br />~41-0012 <br /> <br />Oct. 28, 1992 <br /> <br />Preoaid Amount <br /> $53.46 <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, these prepayments were not removed from the assessment roll at Anoka <br />County; and , <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, to correct the County roll it is necessary that the City of Ramsey approve <br />abatement. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OF RAMSRY,'ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />1) That. the 'City Council of the City of Ramsey hereby approves abatement of special <br /> assesS~nents for Improvement Project ~)1-03, City Fund #435, County Fund #1942 for <br /> parcel~R24-32-25-41-0012. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />That;the City of Ramsey hereby instructs the Finance Officer to process all paperwork as <br />required by Anoka County Auditor's Office in this regard and to notify the property owners <br />invol~ed of the Council's action. <br /> <br />The motion fOr the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Beyer and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the <br /> <br />Mayor Gilbertson <br />CoUrt.tuber Zimmerman <br />Comle~..~.ber Beyer <br />Cougher Hardin <br />Counejlmember Peterson <br /> <br />following voted against the same: <br /> <br />Non~ <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />and the foliow~ing were absent: <br /> <br />Non~ <br /> <br /> <br />