Resolution - #94-08-163 - 08/22/1994

Home

Councilmember Peterson introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION #94-08-163 RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND CALLING FOR A FEASIBILITY STUDY ON IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #94-22 (EXTENSION OF SANITARY SEWER AI~D iWATER SERVICES ALONG 150TH LANE N.W. FROM THE EASTERN iBOUNDARY OF PONDVALE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION TO A POINT API~.ROXIMATELY 275 FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH HELIUM STREET N.W.) WHEiREAS, on August 15, 1994, the City received a petition requesting the improvement 9f the extension of sanitary sewer and water services along 150th Lane N.W. from the eastern bo ~Undary of Pondvale Estates 2nd Addition to a point approximately 275 feet west of the intersection with Helium Street N.W.; and WHEREAS, the City Administrator has found the petition to be of the correct percentage of lawful signatures of affected property owners; and WHEREAS, the City Administrator has found the petition to be in accordance with the City Charter and Minnesota Statutes concerning local improvements. NOW THER~EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: 1) That a certain petition requesting the improvement of the extension of sanitary sewer and water services along 150th Lane N.W. from the eastern boundary of Pondvale Estates 2nd AdditiOn to a point approximately 275 feet west of the intersection with Helium Street N.W. has been filed with the City Council on August 22, 1994. The petition is hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of affected property owners. This declaration is made in conformity to City of Ramsey Code Section 4.60 and Minnesota Statute Chapter 429. 2) That thc petition is hereby referred to Steve Jankowski, City Engineer, and he is instructed to preplu'e a feasibility study to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to the cost of the project to each affected property owner. The City Engineer shall also comment as to whether it should best be done as proposed or in conjunction with some other improvement. 3) That the above mentioned project shall hereby be referred to as Improvement Project g94- 22. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Hardin and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Gilbertson Counciltnember Peterson Councilmember Hardin Couneilmember Beyer Councilmember Zimmerman and the following voted against the same: None