My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/10/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/10/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:39:58 AM
Creation date
7/5/2006 8:06:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
07/10/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Street and are preserving all of the vegetation along 151 st. He stated there is also a natural <br />berm that occurs, and they will be adding more trees. <br /> <br />Jeff Litfin, MN Skyline Partners, stated that there is obviously a strong sense of <br />community here. He stated that he wants the residents to know that they do not take <br />these matters lightly. He indicated that they are not a big outfit, but they are one of <br />excellence. He stated they want to make this work for everyone, and do not want to be <br />the enemy. He encouraged the neighbors to bring up issues, and if they can address <br />them, they will. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Johnson noted that when looking at a Comprehensive Plan review <br />change, there should be some compelling reason to change it. He stated that the only <br />reason he has heard is that close to the road there is a problem having single-family <br />homes, and the developer wants to have more of a buffer. He indicated that in his mind <br />that is not enough reason, since that is the case all along County Road 5. He stated he <br />would need a better reason to recommend the change. <br /> <br />Motion by Vice Chairperson Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Brauer to close the <br />public heating at 9:20 p.m. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chairperson Johnson, Commissioners Brauer, <br />Cleveland, Shepherd, and Van Scoy. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Nixt, and <br />Commissioner Levine. <br /> <br />Case #5: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Review of Skyline Pointe; Case of MN <br />Skyline Partners, LLC <br /> <br />Commission Input <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy indicated that the proposal that they have looks like a nice <br />development, and he appreciates the work put into it. He seconded Vice Chairperson <br />Johnson's comment on a compelling reason to change the Comprehensive Plan. He <br />stated that he is thinking there may be a way to blend the two concepts. He indicated that <br />he does like the interconnected walkways, but is having a hard time seeing this type of <br />development going into this area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer commented that he needed to abstain from these two cases because <br />of his potential involvement in the school board. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cleveland stated that she also has concerns about the number of cards, but <br />she understands the concerns of trying to put single-family homes in this location. She <br />indicated she likes the concept, but the other concern is where construction trucks will be <br />coming through during the construction phase. <br /> <br />44 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.