Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Beyer introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 096-02-039 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING ALLOCATION <br />AUTHORIZING PAYMENT THEREOF <br /> <br />OF DAMAGES AND <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />Section 1. ]3.ac, kgI.o, ll~. <br /> <br />1.1. <br /> <br />That the City of Ramsey is a defendant in the cases of Starks v. Minneapolis Police <br />Recruitment System, et al.; Hennepin County District Court File No. EM93-219, and <br />Fields v. Minnesota Police Recruitment system, et al.; District Court File No. EM93-218. <br /> <br />1.2. <br /> <br />That the Court has concluded in said actions that the defendants violated Minnesota <br />Statutes, Chapter 363, the Minnesota Human Rights Act, in the administration of the <br />Minnesota Police Recruitment System (MPRS) testing process for entry level police <br />officers employment screening and that defendants are obligated to pay certain damages and <br />penalties. <br /> <br />1.3. <br /> <br />That in its order dated November 6, 1995, the Court determined that the defendant cities are <br />obligated to pay $156,688 in damages for lost wages and emotional distress. <br /> <br />1.4. <br /> <br />That the Court has also determined that the MPRS, a joint powers organization of which <br />the City is a member, or was a member at the time the actions were commenced, is <br />obligated to pay each of the two plaintiffs punitive damages in the amount of $8,500. <br /> <br />1.5o <br /> <br />That the Court has not yet made a determination as to the award of plaintiffs' costs, <br />disbursements, and attorneys' fees. <br /> <br />1.6. <br /> <br />That the Court also determined that the unlawful discrimination by the defendants can <br />reasonably be remedied in part by paying a statutory penalty in the amount of $300,000 to <br />the State of Minnesota, or in lieu of such penalty establishing a reasonable minority race <br />hiring commitment satisfactory to the Court. In the event a hiring commitment is submitted <br />to the Court which is found to be satisfactory, it may be that the payment of a statutory <br />penalty will not be required. <br /> <br />1.7. <br /> <br />That the MPRS has proposed that the payment of monetary damages to the plaintiffs <br />described above in paragraph 1.3, punitive damages described above in paragraph 1.4 and <br />plaintiffs' costs, disbursements and attorneys' fees be allocated among the parties on the <br />following basis. <br /> <br />20% of such costs would be divided equally among the 36 city defendants. <br />80% of such damages would be divided pro rata on the basis of the <br />population served by the cities police departments as of the time the actions <br />were commenced in January of 1993. Such population would be <br />determined on the basis of Metropolitan Council estimates for cities in the <br />metropolitan area. For communities outside of the metropolitan area the <br />population would be determined by the State Demographer's estimates. For <br />communities with service contracts under which police service is provided <br />to other municipalities, the populations of such other municipalities would <br />be included in the computation of population served. <br /> <br /> <br />