Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />13. <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />17. <br /> <br />18. <br /> <br />19. <br /> <br />That the Applicant has stated that the proposed haul route for incoming and outgoing macks <br />will be from three access points: two on County Road #116 and one on 149th Avenue <br />N.W. <br /> <br />That no fill materials, except topsoil for restoration, are proposed to be imported to the site. <br /> <br />That no blasting will be employed in the grading activity. <br /> <br />That the existing drainage patterns will not be substantially altered by the proposed grading <br />plan. <br /> <br />That the grading plan proposes to install silt fence around the perimeter of Wetland #118. <br /> <br />That the grading operation will increase the traffic to and from the subject property for a <br />one year time frame. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons <br />residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or market <br />value of any surrounding property. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring <br />USES. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will be a substantial improvement to property in the mediate <br />vicinity and to the community as a whole. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will be served adequately by public facilities and services such as <br />highways and streets. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for <br />public facilities and services, and it will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the <br />community. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, and equipment <br />and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general <br />welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. <br /> <br />That no opposition to the Applicant's request was expressed or submitted at the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Peterson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Councilmember Gerald Zimmerman <br />Councilmember Kenneth Peterson <br />Councilmember Sheila Beyer <br />Councilmember Carolyn Beahen <br /> <br /> <br />