Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Zimmerman introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #97-08-233 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING <br />PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #97- <br />10 (SEALCOAT AND CRACK FILL TROTT BROOK ESTATES) <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, a contract has been let and costs have been determined with reference to the <br />sealcoating and crack filling of Trott Brook Estates, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred <br />in the making of such improvement amount to $4,197 so that the total cost of the improvement <br />will be $4,197. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />That the portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City of Ramsey is <br />hereby declared to be $2,098 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited <br />property owners is declared to be $2,099. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />That the principal of the assessments shall be in annual installments extending over a <br />period of three (3) years; the first of the installments to be payable on or before December <br />31, 1998 and shall bear interest, per annum from the date of the adoption of the <br />assessment resolution, at the rate of two (2) percent above the U.S. Treasury Rate. <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />That the City Administrator shall calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for <br />such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district <br />affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file in the city <br />offices a copy of such proposed assessment for public inspection. <br /> <br />4) <br /> <br />That the City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, <br />notify the Ramsey City Council thereof. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br />CouncilmemberBeyer, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec <br />Councilmember Zimmerman <br />Councilmember Beyer <br />Councilmember Beahen <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br /> <br />