Laserfiche WebLink
10. <br /> <br />That literal interpretation of the provisions of City Code would deprive the Applicants of <br />rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district, namely the right to have an <br />accessory building on the premises. <br /> <br />11. That if granted, the variance will not permit a use that is prohibited in the R-1 Rural <br /> Residential District. <br /> <br />12. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. <br /> <br />13. That if granted, the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br /> property. <br /> <br />14. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably increase the congestion in the public <br /> street. <br /> <br />15. That if granted, the variance will not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. <br /> <br />16. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably diminish property values in the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> <br />17. That if granted, the variance will not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />18. That, if granted, the variance will not grant the Applicants any special privilege that is denied <br /> to other owners of land in the same district. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member <br />Bawden, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Chairperson Ben Deemer <br />Board Member Sharon Jensen <br />Board Member David Bawden <br />Board Member Leo Anderson <br />Board Member Joe Wivoda <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #98-06-108 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />