Laserfiche WebLink
Should the variance be approved,the structure will need to have a building permit. It is likely that the structure <br /> will need to be rebuilt to meet the fire rating requirements. Variances to the Building Code are not possible since <br /> this is a state-wide regulation. The applicant has met with the City's Building Official to discuss correction <br /> options. The onus is on the applicant to provide plans to the Building Inspections Division for a permit review. <br /> This could mean hiring a licensed design professional to assist the applicant in exploring options and preparing <br /> the plans. <br /> Variance <br /> The applicant is requesting a variance to the side yard setback requirement of 5 feet for both the slab and the <br /> lean-to structure. City Code mirrors state law on the possible justification criteria for granting variances. Overall, <br /> the request must be reasonable and unique to the property. The following is the section of City Code addressing <br /> variances: <br /> Sec. 106-220. - Variances. <br /> (a) Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this <br /> chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br /> (b)Public hearing notice mailing distance is 350 feet. <br /> (c) Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties <br /> in complying with the zoning code. "Practical difficulties,"as used in connection with the granting of a variance, <br /> means: <br /> (1) That the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning <br /> code; <br /> (2) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; <br /> (3) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> (4)Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties; <br /> (5)Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy <br /> systems; and <br /> (6)Public takings of property due to condemnation. <br /> (7) Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stats. §216C.06, subd. 14, <br /> when in harmony with this chapter. <br /> (d) The planning commission may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under the zoning code for <br /> property in the district where the affected person's land is located. <br /> (e) The planning commission may impose conditions in the granting of variances.A condition must be directly <br /> related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. <br /> The applicant provided a narrative outlining his justification for the variances attached to this report. He stated <br /> that his variance request meets criteria 1,2, and 3 above. <br /> Additional Consideration <br /> The structure is constructed in a platted drainage and utility easement. Per City Code, driveways are allowed in <br /> these easements provided that they do not inhibit the flow of water and its removal is at the owner's expense in the <br /> event that the easement area is needed for its intended use. The lean-to,however, is not permitted. Therefore, an <br /> encroachment agreement is necessary if the variance is approved. <br /> Notification: <br /> Mailed notifications were sent to property owners within 350 feet of the site. A "proposed development" sign <br /> was placed on the property. A legal notice was placed in the July 12 Anoka Union Hearld Newspaper. <br /> Time Frame/Observations/Alternatives: <br />