Laserfiche WebLink
Brian Nagel, 6940 148th Lane, commented that he is the neighbor to the east. He recognized that <br /> there is a due process that should be followed but there are a lot of people that park things next to <br /> their homes in Ramsey. He commented that this is a nice structure, along with the other structure <br /> constructed by another neighbor to house those things. He appreciated that the residents are <br /> investing in their properties to contain some of those things. He agreed that fire is scary but noted <br /> that there are many examples in Ramsey where things are constructed even closer to one another. <br /> He believed that there would be other ways to combat and find a balance to allow this structure on <br /> the street. <br /> Commissioner Bauer asked the Building Official to respond to the comments from the applicant. <br /> Building Official Schreder stated that recommendations and referrals are not something they can <br /> typically do, but he did speak with the applicant about ways to encapsulate the interior walls. He <br /> stated that the Building Code requires five feet of separation between unprotected elements and <br /> anything within that setback would need to meet a one-hour fire resistance of construction. He <br /> stated that something like this would need to have fire resistant sheet rock. He stated that typically <br /> zero lot line setbacks are reserved for commercial or multi-family residential and not single-family. <br /> He stated that this could possible meet Building Code, but the steps necessary are not well defined <br /> in the Building Code because that five foot setback is violated. <br /> Commissioner Anderson asked if there is a utility easement between the homes. <br /> Planning Manager Larson confirmed that there is a utility easement and therefore if the variance <br /> were approved, the Council would also need to approve a utility easement encroachment <br /> agreement. He stated that through the Zoning Code update, a few exemptions were added such as <br /> driveways. He stated that if it were just the slab, an encroachment agreement would not be <br /> necessary. <br /> Commissioner Anderson asked how much of the slab would need to be cut to meet the five-foot <br /> setback. <br /> Mr. Forster replied that would be five feet. <br /> Commissioner Anderson asked how much room would be left if five feet were removed. <br /> Mr. Forster replied that would leave around 15 feet. He stated that the trailer cannot be placed <br /> under the hangover from the garage because it is too high. <br /> Commissioner Anderson stated that he is concerned with the easement location and there is a <br /> reason that five feet is required from the property line. <br /> Mr. Forster stated that all his utilities are located on the other side of the home and therefore he <br /> would find it unlikely that there are any utilities within that easement. <br /> Planning Commission/July 25, 2024 <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br />