My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/10/2024
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2024
>
Agenda - Council - 09/10/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:33:04 AM
Creation date
9/11/2024 11:55:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/10/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
367
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Van Scoy congratulated the applicant and commented that this is awesome. <br /> Commissioner Heineman asked the type of material that would be used for the roof. <br /> Mr. Andriychuk replied that they would be using architectural style asphalt shingles. <br /> Commissioner Heineman asked and received confirmation that the turn in would be south of the <br /> septic location. He asked if that septic site would be raised, as that could create an issue with <br /> visibility. He urged the applicant to ensure that the stormwater basin is sloped properly to manage <br /> the runoff. <br /> City Planner Martin commented that stormwater management review is done administratively be <br /> engineering staff but invited the project engineer to provide more information. <br /> Scott Dahlke, project engineer, stated that the soils are very granular and therefore they do not <br /> anticipate needing a mound. He commented that the grading for the stormwater pond would have <br /> reasonable slopes, very typical for stormwater ponding. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff referenced the tree inventory, noting that many trees were removed <br /> in the last year. He asked if the inventory was done before or after that removal. <br /> City Planner Martin was unsure as that review was done by Senior Planner Anderson. <br /> Mr. Andriychuk replied that the tree inventory was done after that removal. He commented that <br /> the trees that were removed were in poor condition, pretty much dead, and the live trees were left <br /> on the site. <br /> James Bagne, 8077 155th Lane, commented that a lot of trees were removed from the east side of <br /> the property and asked if additional trees would be removed. He explained that they were <br /> attempting to determine if there would still be trees left as a buffer between the church and the <br /> homes. He asked if the church would remain in the same area that it currently is. <br /> Mr. Andriychuk replied that they are attempting to keep the perimeter of the site as natural as <br /> possible and do not have plans in the future to remove trees around the outside of the property. He <br /> stated that they left the area to the north mostly as it is as the neighbor did not even want the dead <br /> trees removed in that area. <br /> Brandon McDowal, 15673 Hedgehog Street NW, asked if the parking lot lights would be on all <br /> the time, or regulated. He noted that the area is mostly dark sky as it currently exists. <br /> Mr. Andriychuk replied that was something they discussed with staff, noting that they are trying <br /> to keep all the light on the parking lot so it would not extend into the neighboring properties. <br /> Planning Commission/July 25, 2024 <br /> Page 4 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.