Laserfiche WebLink
r< <br /> i'. <br /> 5. POLICY BOARD BUSINESS <br /> 1= <br /> 5.01: Consider Natural Resources Aspects of Site Plan for U-Haul (Project No. 24--115); <br /> Case of U-Haul <br /> Senior Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He stated that the City received a Land Use <br /> Application for U-Haul for a Conditional Use Permit for a proposed U-Haul Moving and Storage <br /> Facility, located at 8725 Riverdale Drive. The Business operation would include the following <br /> uses on site: self-storage, truck and trailer rental, and related retail sales. <br /> Board Member Burgess asked if light pollution is considered for the adjacent residential <br /> development. <br /> Senior Planner Anderson replied that the existing screening on the south side of the road would <br /> address those concerns. He noted that the zoning code was recentlydated, including lighting <br /> updated, g g g : <br /> regulations. is <br /> Motion by Board Member Salami and seconded by Board Member Hagerty to recommend <br /> approval of the Landscape Plan, contingent upon compliance with staff s required corrections. <br /> t <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Fetterley, Board Member Salami, Hagerty, Bernard, ! <br /> Burgess, and Houts. Voting No:None. Absent: Board Member Moore. <br /> 5.02: Consider Natural Resources Aspects of Site Plan for Voice of Hope Church Pro'ect <br /> No,24--114); Case of voice of Hope Church <br /> Senior Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He stated that the City received a Land Use IN <br /> Application from Voice of Hope Church for review of a Site Plan and Final Plat <br /> proposed �'. <br /> regarding the property located at 15620 Armstrong Boulevard NW. <br /> Board Member Salami asked if there was a public hearing for this project to allow residents near <br /> this property to provide input. <br /> Senior Planner Anderson replied that notices have been sent for the public hearing to be conducted <br /> by the Planning Commission at their July meeting. He acknowledged that the residential property <br /> to the north may not be thrilled with this use, but it is a permitted use within the zoning district. <br /> Chairperson Fetterley referenced the areas to the northwest and south and commented that those <br /> areas appear to remain untouched. She asked if staff is satisfied that the trees proposed to add <br /> shade to the parking would be adequate and whether tree islands would be a good addition. <br /> Senior Planner Anderson commented that there are trees around the perimeter which would meet <br /> the parking lot landscaping requirements. He stated that a recommendation for parking lot islands <br /> could be made, but explained that is a tough growing environment for a tree. <br /> m <br /> r. <br /> ti <br /> Environmental Policy Board 1 July 15, 2024 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />