My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Resolution - #24-232 - 08/27/2024
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Resolutions
>
2024
>
Resolution - #24-232 - 08/27/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 1:56:03 PM
Creation date
10/1/2024 2:10:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions & Ordinances
Resolutions or Ordinances
Resolutions
Resolution or Ordinance Number
#24-232
Document Date
08/27/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Member Musgrove introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION #24-232 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK AND <br />ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR A LEAN-TO STRUCTURE AND CONCRETE <br />SLAB AT 6960 148TH LANE NORTHWEST <br />RECITALS <br />1. The City of Ramsey received an application from Mr. Curtis Forster (the "Applicant") <br />requesting a Variance to Section 106-450(3) (Setback standards for accessory structures) <br />and Section 106-463(c) (Setback standards for driveways) of the Ramsey City Code on the <br />property legally described as follows: <br />Lot 2, Block 6, Regency Pond 3rd Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota <br />(the "Subject Property") <br />2. That the Subject Property is approximately 0.82 acres in size and zoned R-1A Single - <br />Family Residential District. <br />3. That the Applicant constructed the concrete slab and lean-to structure within inches of the <br />west property line without the proper building permits. <br />4. That the Applicant was notified of a Code Enforcement violation. <br />5. That the Applicant appeared before the Planning Commission for a public hearing <br />pursuant to Section 106-220 (Variances) of the Ramsey City Code on July 25, 2024, and <br />that said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing <br />are available. <br />6. That the Planning Commission voted to deny the variance citing a lack of adequate <br />practical difficulties to justify the variance. <br />7. That the Applicant appealed the decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council <br />in the manner prescribed in Section 106-220. <br />8. That the City Council heard the appeal at a regular meeting on August 12, 2024, and <br />provided direction on the practical difficulties. <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br />1. That the reduced setback of the lean-to and slab is necessary due to the curve of the road <br />on the opposite side of the lot. <br />2. That the reduced setback of the lean-to and slab is necessary due to utility lines in the <br />middle of the lot. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.