Laserfiche WebLink
The consensus of the Council was to direct Staff to gather data and insights from the November <br />election and bring it back for discussion for future elections and to make St. Katherine Drexel <br />Church a polling location. <br />2.03: Driveway Discussion <br />Planning Manager Larson shared the Staff report in regard to two recent variances that were <br />requested concerning extensions of existing driveways on the sides of the garages closer than the <br />required five feet. <br />Councilmember Musgrove shared that she believes five feet is a lot and would like the requirement <br />to be smaller. <br />Councilmember Howell thanked Planning Manager Larson for his presentation with lots of visuals <br />to aid in understanding the discussion. She said she would not be opposed to reducing the <br />requirement to zero feet from the property line like Coon Rapids does. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff shared that he had a neighbor whose driveway was right up to the <br />property line, and he stated this was not the best experience. He added that this contradicts the idea <br />that they want to keep the City feeling more rural. He noted that structures bother him more than <br />a driveway. He asked how often things like easements would get in the way of these types of <br />scenarios. <br />Planning Manager Larson explained that with the Zoning Code update they put in language about <br />easements and what can and cannot encroach into them. <br />Assistant City Engineer Feriancek explained that in the past they have allowed fences up to the lot <br />line; however, fences can be easily moved to work on utilities, and this would be more complicated <br />with something like a driveway. <br />Councilmember Olson said he would be supportive of reducing the requirement down to anything <br />lower than five feet, including zero feet. He noted that he thinks it will still be quite rare that they <br />will see a driveway going all the way to a lot line. <br />Councilmember Specht stated that he would support lessening the requirement or allowing <br />driveways up to the lot line. <br />Councilmember Riley suggested lowering the requirement but not going down to allow driveways <br />to the lot line as neighbors can often fight about where lot lines are. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff agreed that this could cause further confusion on where property lines <br />are. <br />Councilmember Howell stated that they should enforce the code when needed but put it on the <br />property owners to determine their lot lines before installing a driveway extension. <br />City Council Work Session / September 10, 2024 <br />Page 8 of 13 <br />