My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/24/2024
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2024
>
Agenda - Council - 09/24/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:34:17 AM
Creation date
10/8/2024 11:30:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/24/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
479
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The consensus of the Council was to direct Staff to gather data and insights from the November <br />election and bring it back for discussion for future elections and to make St. Katherine Drexel <br />Church a polling location. <br />2.03: Driveway Discussion <br />Planning Manager Larson shared the Staff report in regard to two recent variances that were <br />requested concerning extensions of existing driveways on the sides of the garages closer than the <br />required five feet. <br />Councilmember Musgrove shared that she believes five feet is a lot and would like the requirement <br />to be smaller. <br />Councilmember Howell thanked Planning Manager Larson for his presentation with lots of visuals <br />to aid in understanding the discussion. She said she would not be opposed to reducing the <br />requirement to zero feet from the property line like Coon Rapids does. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff shared that he had a neighbor whose driveway was right up to the <br />property line, and he stated this was not the best experience. He added that this contradicts the idea <br />that they want to keep the City feeling more rural. He noted that structures bother him more than <br />a driveway. He asked how often things like easements would get in the way of these types of <br />scenarios. <br />Planning Manager Larson explained that with the Zoning Code update they put in language about <br />easements and what can and cannot encroach into them. <br />Assistant City Engineer Feriancek explained that in the past they have allowed fences up to the lot <br />line; however, fences can be easily moved to work on utilities, and this would be more complicated <br />with something like a driveway. <br />Councilmember Olson said he would be supportive of reducing the requirement down to anything <br />lower than five feet, including zero feet. He noted that he thinks it will still be quite rare that they <br />will see a driveway going all the way to a lot line. <br />Councilmember Specht stated that he would support lessening the requirement or allowing <br />driveways up to the lot line. <br />Councilmember Riley suggested lowering the requirement but not going down to allow driveways <br />to the lot line as neighbors can often fight about where lot lines are. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff agreed that this could cause further confusion on where property lines <br />are. <br />Councilmember Howell stated that they should enforce the code when needed but put it on the <br />property owners to determine their lot lines before installing a driveway extension. <br />City Council Work Session / September 10, 2024 <br />Page 8 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.