Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Manager Larson stated that it would seem that side yard setback should then just be three <br /> feet, rather than requiring five feet and then it could be reduced a month later. <br /> Commissioner Van Scoy asked where a fence would go between two properties, specifically <br /> whether that can be placed on the property line or whether it must be set back. <br /> Planning Manager Larson replied that the Code requires the fence to be on your own side of the <br /> property line. <br /> Commissioner Van Scoy commented that he also supports leaving the regulation as is and continue <br /> to review deviations through the variance process. He commented that there logically needs to be <br /> space between driveways for vehicle doors to open, snow removal, and should someone want a <br /> fence. <br /> Commissioner Heineman stated that if someone buys an acre and if five feet is taken from the <br /> perimeter that is essentially a ten percent reduction of the property size. He stated that if the issue <br /> is snow removal,that is essentially treating a problem before it arises. He stated that people could <br /> push snow to the other side of their driveway. He recognized that he may be in the minority on <br /> this issue. He stated that although he would not recommend someone put their driveway zero feet <br /> from their property line, someone should be able to if they wanted. <br /> Commissioner Hunt stated that he could see keeping the variance process the same but could also <br /> support a reduction from five feet. He stated that perhaps the setback is reduced to one foot as that <br /> would allow for the placement of a fence if that were desired in the future. <br /> Planning Manager Larson commented that a five-foot setback tends to be common in early <br /> subdivisions built in the 1970s and on to allow for drainage to flow between the properties and <br /> away from the homes. <br /> Chairperson Gengler commented that the cases they heard at the last meeting were different and <br /> specific and could not recall a lot of requests of this nature that the Commission has considered in <br /> the past,therefore this would seem to be fixing an issue that is not widespread. She stated that she <br /> would also prefer to keep the regulation and variance process as it is. <br /> 8. COMMISSION/ STAFF INPUT <br /> Planning Manager Larson provided an update on planning related matters. <br /> Senior Planner Anderson noted the upcoming Fall Recycling Event in September and the Fix It <br /> Clinic in October. <br /> 9. ADJOURNMENT <br /> Motion by Commissioner Bauer, seconded by Commissioner Peters, to adjourn the meeting. <br /> A roll call vote was performed: <br /> Planning Commission/August 22, 2024 <br /> Page 8 of 9 <br />