|
<br />.. "
<br />
<br />'.
<br />
<br />".". ;..--
<br />
<br />.,~_..--~. ~ ~:..
<br />
<br />Estillldled capital cost .fol- ttlE project is as follows;
<br />
<br />two each
<br />
<br />85 kW induction gene~ators from
<br />gener"ator installation
<br />5 hp gas blo~~er with enclosure
<br />pipeline engineering
<br />pipeline cost 17200' a 513/ft)
<br />Gas field development
<br />Total investmen~ necessa~y
<br />
<br />PEl $87,556
<br />(estimated) 5,000
<br />II _ 4,030
<br />" ~~-;-- .2 000
<br />,
<br />93,600
<br />__11,000_
<br />$203,186
<br />
<br />one each
<br />
<br />7.5'depth
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />ADVANTAGES; EngIne generator located at plant site thereby making
<br />them accessab 1 ~ for (1) ea.si er mal. ntenanc:e~ (2) low cost
<br />interface with p~ant electrical system, and (3) recovery of waste
<br />heat. It should ~e noted that an addition of 18490 will equip
<br />bath engines for jacket water recovery of waste heat. This net
<br />output will be approximately 370,000 BTU/hr per unit. Either
<br />unit should handle Waltek's current heating load with the second
<br />adE'quale TOI'- futur.e E?>:p,,-ol.nSiUfl"
<br />
<br />DlSADVt:'I-~Tt~IGES; Lengtll'y'!, lQ..rge di.=..metE'r pipeline subject to damage
<br />d~e to settling and potentially requir.ng substantial
<br />mairltena~ce of .~dter traps, elc. Pipeline is qllite expensive and
<br />of limited cap~clty. Optiorl ijl would serve a lna~imuo. of around
<br />12() eFt1 or 17=~800 CFD>. Ttle Elf\COn report indicates that
<br />1 0::'00 (ji-:;(; CFD' Dr' mot"e,. is rE'co'v'erabl e.
<br />~ .-. - - ~ -" -- -
<br />
<br />QF'TIOr-~ #2; : (T~'-Jo 85 kt'; iJE,nerdtGt-S loc-=..,ted at the ~"'altek plant
<br />~'Jith .:1" mEdiuf1: l=q-f.~S.!::-Llt-E:? (5(\ ~,=i~ ~dpE:-line etnd ~.n ETlgine driven
<br />f)Unlpiflg si.:.:~.t.iOII l.DCd1.:.E-d on th~ l-:,.r,,j'fill.) The net benefits from
<br />the initial project would be siolilar to option #1 as far as
<br />~cGnCJiTli ,= rE-:"lur-n is c.onC:E.t-ned. lhe ~250lmonth el ectr i cal cost
<br />~-Joul d be E.'! i mi ni.t2cl. HCJ~~Je'/er an ;..ppro:: i ol<:\te $:t92/month cost of
<br />mc.,intai nJ ny thE "ErH]ine and COlnpressor Io-,jould bl~ Incurred when
<br />oper~ting ~t t~l~ Si.!nE C2paclty.
<br />
<br />~;ntj clj.J,:;.;_tc-d cu:~t:.: ,.;.;;::. :-,.~~ 1-;_::11 C;~-'J~:
<br />
<br />tlrJCi E'.:.:..crl
<br />
<br />C."",
<br />'_J...,
<br />
<br />. ~.. ,-. ,- .-
<br />;;.\...1_' ;:,;
<br />
<br />'ft'om FE!
<br />
<br />~li87 ~ 556
<br />5~OOO
<br />28,000
<br />1,1)(H)
<br />72, (1(10
<br />., __11,000_
<br />$2()4~ 556
<br />
<br />k ~'J ~. r~ ~:! ..i. n (-__:.
<br />
<br />aenEI'
<br />
<br />(estimated)
<br />
<br />gerl~r"Dtur' i;..~t311~ticn
<br />3;) hp ,__=::..~;~ ne 81-- i -.. t::r; CC'!1.pf-E.=:S.DI'""
<br />p:;.~:?] ~ : ,,_:: l::...'I,':..!J r-.(-:'l-:~'!-lnq
<br />plpEL::.n,=,. c.c,:-.;.t.. ~~-"-".'
<br />i;....:;(":'. 01 'h...J c.1~--.elDpmc_'rlt.
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />:rl\~-,/+t
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />~.~ 1 abc.r-
<br />
<br />englne;:?I"-ing
<br />
<br />Tot 13. J.
<br />
<br />f~;~Y"';~-II~THI_!'_~,~ '...dll.il_,: ~.'__' ur:t1'_.;fi ~11 ~-Jil.._h the Ctdc11tion of qr-eatly
<br />incr~2i~...Si--:~ ~.:~~'t::i:.'<, ,:...;);';'..1.:.:.11_\. -f;,~. qu.cd:.'.t=:'O t:L!U:~pITIL::-'rit could be
<br />c.p.-:::'r--t.~t-;;:d ::d: up ~_c' :-:c.:::;~ '.)'.'0 '--'~!.l l\'l th the3peci f i ed gas compressor.
<br />Wltti ~J~:t.lcr-l~! ~~~: (.C!fll~jr~SSlCn equi~Jl112nt the pi~~llne would be
<br />,.:",,:.p,;..blp 0-,= ~10.Tld~:r-'(J t.t,;:.~ <.-:'r'ltit-<..~ land+lll reco....erable output. Gas
<br />eLm SUii1i".J i: ..i. (ill l.), "'.. !;I.' CC:J(:11J;' t.~~l= or-'~: loJl] 1 bE' '::'.ppr 0:: 1 m~,tel'.}" l /. of the
<br />.J':-;;;. j.:H\i;I~_".:.~. '~'",:..d~L>f ,.11~",L:'-!...t-:>r flt2::ible plpellne is less
<br />
<br />,
<br />~
<br />
|