My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/22/1983
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 03/22/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 11:57:06 AM
Creation date
7/17/2006 8:08:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/22/1983
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br /># <br /> <br />,'. <br /> <br />. . <br />. <br /> <br />.-.-.' <br /> <br />.--" - <br />--------, <br /> <br />..all be PC.J::';SlLrJf..- ,:<TII.} pcll2r,llvi p'''CJbl12nls r:;.:ist with ltll2 <br />operator" ~110w~r)y this type c: arrangement. <br /> <br />landfill <br /> <br />Conclusion <br /> <br />From our posiLen, cp~ion 81 appears to be an expensive and <br />cumberson trade off against the beneflts obtained. Option #2 <br />appedrs n)Uctl more attrdctlve since for a very modest inc~ease in <br />project cost it would add much potential value to the industrial <br />park. Option 83 offers no advantage to the industrial park .and <br />hClS . mic.rgi nal retLlrn. Opt 1 on #4 h~,s mLlch to commend it. It <br />pr'evides .oLICh of option #1's benefits and potential saleability <br />to future industrial users with minimal capital expense. Several <br />detailed legal quest10ns alu5~ be addressed before this option may <br />be implemented. However, it seems most attractive. <br /> <br />It is unfortunate that landfill development must be included. In <br />conversation with Mr. John Pacey of Emcon, it was indicated that <br />the existing migration control system is unusable as a fuel <br />source since the gas is of very poor quality. Operation of this <br />system dS c3. recover-y sy.stem ~t reduced flow rates would jepordize <br />it$ prjmary function of gas ~nigration control. <br /> <br />-It would seeOl ttle fInal decision must rest upon the value of the <br />piptd ine" S "'::pen',;," to the Industrial park. Both option #2 and #4 <br />Appear economically attractlve. To pursue one option beybnd the <br />decision point will requil-e desi.gn engineering. We at PEl would <br />be most pleased to aSSIst in dny manner possible. Our specialty <br />lie;;, il"l th{;? pO~-.Jer' ge:.net-ati.on dild SLtppor-tive facilities area. We <br />strongly recommerld EmcGn be contracted for landfill development <br /> <br />St'?t--..,.-"1 Ci;.:". <br /> <br />__O~~_ffL~~~--- <br /> <br />Jerf"~' ~1. Collins <br />HPp'lic.:..1i..i.:Jns Engi.neel~ <br /> <br />~~~ <br /> <br />------------------------------ <br /> <br />Ted Landers <br />F',-esi dent <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.