Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />North Central Cable Communications Corporatlon09:34 Woodhlll DrlveoRosevllle. MN 5511:3o(612) 48:3-:32:3:3 <br /> <br />July 26, 1988 <br /> <br />St. Paul Pioneer Press Dispatch <br />345 Cedar Street <br />St. Paul, MN 55101 <br /> <br />To The Editor: <br /> <br />An article in the July 20, 1988 issue of the St. Paul Pioneer Press Dispatch entilled, "Cable Firm <br />Asks Cities To Run Public Access", quotes Dr. Ronald C. Eggert, Chairman of the North Suburban <br />Cable Commission, as follows: <br />I <br />''They're lying; they're just trying to usurp us," said Ron Eggert, Chairman of the <br />North Suburban Cable Commission, referring to the company's reported costs. He <br />said the company, repeatedly has failed to produce itemized accounts. As a result, <br />the North Suburban Commission plans to conduct its own audit. <br />I <br />We regret, that the Chairman of the Commission has chosen to use this type of false and <br />Inflammatory rhetoric as a way to avoid dealing with the substance of a cable television consumer <br />issue, which has been before the North Suburban Cable Commission for over two years. <br />I <br />The issue is that Cable TV North Central is being required by the Commission to incur a cost of <br />$4.34 per month per subscriber for public access and local origination programming, on cable <br />channels 33 and 52, plus. $.41 per subscriber, per month for excessive insurance company <br />security bonds. Anyone who visits our Public Access facilities knows that they are objectively <br />over-staffed, underutilized and grossly inefficient. We can provide this service for much less than <br />we are presently required to spend. <br />I <br />Because of this officially imposed inefficiency, our costs for these functions are the highest of any <br />cable system in the United States, and it follows that although cable subscribers receive <br />absolutely no offselling' benefit, their rates must be expected to be unnecessarily higher than <br />elsewhere. I <br /> <br />We are seeking only to eliminate this inefficiency, to bring bonding to a reasonable level and <br />thus, to reduce pressure on the rates our subscribers must be asked to pay. This would not <br />reduce the public access and local origination service on cable channels 33 and 52. Everybody <br />would win. I <br /> <br />We do not understand the Commission's objectives in forcing the Company to be inefficient and <br />to waste the money of its subscribers. <br /> <br />Never once, have we been able to discuss this mailer with Chairman Eggert or the Commission <br />in a calm and reasoned manner. <br />