Laserfiche WebLink
<br />th <br />Councilmember Howell asked the rating of 167before it was redone. <br />Assistant City Engineer Feriancek replied that he believed that road was rated as a 5 a few years <br />before it was reconstructedand then deteriorated to a 1 or 2 by the time it was reconstructed. He <br />provided details on some of the road improvements done on better quality roads, such as <br />sealcoating, which do not provide benefit to roads in poor condition. He acknowledged that at a <br />certain point there is nothing that can be done beyond some crack filling/patching before the <br />reconstruction is completed. He reviewed the proposed road CIP, highlighting changes that are <br />proposed. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that the order proposed makes sense, as the worst streets would need <br />to get done first. <br />Assistant City Engineer Feriancek explained that it a combination of addressing the worst streets <br />as well as the available funding. He provided a summary of the road improvement projects <br />proposed for the next ten years as well as potential projects that could arise. He provided details <br />on the funding available as well as anticipated funding needs. <br />Chairperson Musgrove asked if the PIR fund is included in the road financing. <br />Assistant City Engineer Feriancek replied that the intent is to show the different funds used to fund <br />the pavement management fund, noting that the PIR fund is a separate fund that is sometimes used <br />for road projects. <br />Councilmember Riley commented that the pavement management fund did not exist prior to the <br />establishment of the franchise fee when there was dedicated funding. <br />Chairperson Musgrove referenced the proposed growth shown and asked for clarification. <br />Assistant City Engineer Feriancek replied that in years 2023 and earlier those are actual dollars <br />collected whereas the future years would be projected growth. <br />Chairperson Musgrove asked if the project 2024 interest earnings are an estimate. <br />Assistant City Engineer Feriancek confirmed that those future years are estimates as those numbers <br />are not actually known yet. <br />Chairperson Musgrove appreciated the information and updates and asked if an action is requested <br />tonight. <br />Assistant City Engineer Feriancek stated that he was asked to provide an update on what has been <br />done and what is proposed for the future and therefore the draft CIP is not requested to be <br />approved. He stated that this was simply meant to be an update, and any direction could be <br />provided. <br />Public Works Committee / September 17, 2024 <br />Page 10 of 12 <br /> <br />