Laserfiche WebLink
Coumcilmember moved the adoption of the following findings <br />of facts <br />FINDIMS OF FACT 0122 <br />EININ CHRISMPBERSON <br />1. That the Applicant has applied for a Board of Adjustment <br />variance to construct an accessory structure larger than allowed <br />by City We. <br />2. That the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment <br />for a public hearing on August 27, 1985, and that said public <br />hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said <br />public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these <br />findings by reference. <br />3. That the Applicant's property is generally known as 7121 <br />175th Avenue N.W. and is located in the R -1 Residential District. <br />4. That the subject property is approximately 2 acres in size. <br />5. That the Applicant's request is to construct a 30' x 48' <br />accessory structure with a total area of 1440 square feet. <br />6. That the City Code restricts the total square footage of an <br />accessory structure to 624 square feet on parcels of land less <br />than 2 -1/2 acres. <br />7. That there may be exceptional, unique or extraordinary <br />circumstances or conditions applying to the property in question <br />as to the intended use of the property that do not apply <br />generally to other properties in the R-1 Residential District. <br />8. That such variance may be necessary for the preservation and <br />enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that <br />possessed by other properties in the R -1 Residential District and <br />in the same vicinity. The possibility of increased financial <br />return shall not in itself be deemed sufficient to warrant a <br />variance. <br />9. That the authorization of such variance will not be of <br />substantial detriment to adjacent properties and will not <br />materially impair the intent or purpose of this ordinance or the <br />public interest. <br />10. That the condition or situation of the subject property, or <br />the intended use of the property for which the variance is <br />sought, is not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make <br />reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation <br />for such conditions or situation. <br />11. That the variance may observe the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance, may produce substantial justice and may not be <br />contrary to the public interest. <br />- 1 - <br />