Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-3- <br /> <br />'!l' an Illor ta t ion <br />Project Description <br /> <br />, , <br />~ Planned Unit Development <br />Q,Rea14ential devaiopment <br />Ii OOllllercis.al/1n~atrial ' <br />. """ <br /> <br />1253.6 acres <br />ca. 650.0 acres <br />125.0 acree <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />'!l'atnc Description <br /> <br />~,AeeQllled 5 peroe~t/Jl" Snorealle on TH 10/169. <br />o Trip Generation ot 11700 VTE per day. <br />o Trip GeneratiClO III&XSJINm ot 1100 vehiole trips in <br />the peak hour. <br /> <br />TranllportatiCXl concerna 'C? locI... to T1i'10/169 : <br />o MUS! boundery location ' <br />o Jl8lllSey thoroughfare plan <br />o Railrcad oro..ing <br />.., ' . ,0 IlDllOT weight at.aUOD <br /> <br />" ,-. ", --r , <br />In addition to the llo-,UIL'D OPtiOn" three :tiUu.s alternaUves hll'le been <br />identified by the develop'r ot tbl8 projeot;'.:"~~allY each 1s a variation on <br />accesll to the colleotor/J1"ter1alro~d~~~;~"~t.!.~~i~itY or the lite. <br />llonetheleee, thera,u ).1ttle,C!v~aU,ditter.!m2tt..:.P9ng ~e alternatives 10 their <br />reSlltlog levelll-ot.....n1ct "1<..v.raJ.",IJPit.Psn~~~r~ctionll with TB 10/169. <br /> <br />( <br />i <br /> <br />Each of the alternativell oOllta1n oolllllon OClOCerDS tbat can be addressed <br />collectively. The I18jor transportation related concern that 18 cClllllllOn to each <br />alternative 111 tbat ot access to TB 10/169, which 18 defined as a Major <br />Arterial in the CoIIDcll's Transportation J'9~oy PlIO. Tbe a1te of the proposed <br />development 18 located outa1de of the Metropol1tan Urban Services Area (MUSA) <br />as identit1ed in the current Metropol1tan Development framework. As su.ch, land <br />access trom major arterials, Slch all TB 10/169, 18 restricted to freestanding <br />growth oenterll and rural tom centers. The proposed Planned Unit Development, <br />however, 18 an urban use tbat reClU:1res improved access to TB 10/169 at several <br />locations. Unless the MUSA 18 expanded or a Comprehensive Plan amendment is <br />requested by llaIIISey, the project 18 not consistent with Council plans in the <br />rural area. Consequently access to TB 10/169 shoUld be 11m1ted. <br /> <br />No high volume collectors or minor arterials exiat within the ilIIDediate <br />vicinity of the proposed development. It the Planned tln1t Development is <br />approved tor cCXlstruction, the llaIIISey Thoroughfare Plan should be modified to <br />incorporate an ~~~.~~!:.N~r~lsn~;~,AcJ!~s.~, TB..101).6g, slJpu14, bl!, <br />made via the minor arterials, prefll1"al:1~x. I!-~ ,~e !J'l'"at IIDst, two locations. <br /> <br />..-........- <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />. .,. . ..' }.'. (' #'" :"~.;. <br />An additional s1te-relate4 prC!bl- 1s_'th.';P~ J1rox1lll1ty to the'lm'lington- <br />Northern Jlailroad tracks tbat parallel TB 10/169. Any access to the roadway <br />necessitates croasinS th..ra1l, tr.~a, ~c~m&,rall/auto confl1cts. This <br />would be an increaa~,4anger .athe area 'developa.it no crossing gates vere <br />installed. EmergenCJ v~cl. &coelll ',~~: 'tr~'the proposed site would also <br />be interrupted dur1ngraU~ad~. ot. ~,_~&Clis. .. <br />.. . -" ..."- ....-... . . <br /> <br />Five acres ot cOllllllerc1al d8'lelopment are planned.near the Daytonport Weight <br />Station at the intersection ot 153rd Av and TB 10/169. Regardless of the <br />alternative conSidered, access for this cCllllllercial development 18 identit1ed at <br />that intersection. Thill arrangflllent would bein,contl1ct with current and <br />proposed usage ot tbe, weigbt.tation~, ' ~::. ., ,'.. <br /> <br />i <br />, ' <br /> <br /> <br />-59- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />