Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Bartley referred to Case #25 (Consideration of gambling license <br />application for Pheasants Forever) and stated that Council had 30 days to <br />oppose the gambling license application; that 30 days has elapsed. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Schlueter and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to <br />approve the agenda with the following adjustment: <br /> <br />1. Delete Case #25 - Consideration of gambling license application; <br />case of Pheasants Forever (Anoka Chapter) <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Kayor Beitman, CouncilmemberB Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting Ho: Hone. <br /> <br />COUNCIL BUSINESS <br /> <br />CABe #17: Re;:::~~.~:r ~:n~::~:::: ~:.. Permit To.CoUlltrl1ct ~ Mini Storare <br />:::~~:: ~u 376ii-Eb~ ~ Exceed """111m. ImDerV1o~B Surface <br />C_______ __ 1____ ___~ Str~@t RW! CAR~ Of Mr. B111 Dubat8: <br /> <br />Mr. DubatB waB pre Bent and Btated that at the time P&Z reviewed hiB caBe, it <br />waB not a known fact that Ebony Street doeB have storm drainage. Mr. Dubats <br />Btated that he would still be willing to Bubmit. a storm drainage plan to the <br />City Engineer for approval. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Reimann and seconded by Councilmember Schlueter to <br />adopt Findings of Fact 0134 relating to Mr. Bill DubatB' request for a <br />conditional UBe permit. (Refer to findingB of fact file for FindingB of Fact <br />0134). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Kayor Beitman, CouncilmemberB Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting Ho: Hone. <br /> <br />Motion by Counci1aember Reimann and seconded by Councilmember Cox to approve <br />Mr. Bill DubatB' requeBt for a conditional UBe permit to conBtruct a mini <br />Btorage facility and variance to exceed the maximum imperviouB Burface coverage <br />at 13760 Ebony Street Bi, contingent upon DBR approval and the City Engineer's <br />approval of the storm water management plan for the site and upon the applicant <br />entering into a conditional UBe permit agreement with the City. <br /> <br /> <br />Further DiscusBion: Mr. DubatB referred to language in the permit agreement <br />that states the permit and variance 'are subject to review at any time and <br />Bhall be reviewed annually by City Staff.' Mr. DubatB inquired as to the <br />intent of this language. Mr. Goodrich replied that the language iB atandard; <br />the City wants the right to review the property. not neceuarily at any time, <br />after receipt of complaint or indication of violation and on an annual basis. <br />Mr. Goodrich stated that if property reviewal reveals a violation of the permit <br />conditions, the permit holder is subjected to a review hearing and if the <br />violation continues, the City can revoke the permit. Mr. Goodrich atated that <br />language stating 'at any reasonable time' could be substituted for 'at any <br />time'. Mr. Dubats referred to Item #6 which requireB limited outBide storage <br />and that screening be provided; inquired why he is being subjected to higher <br />operating standards than other businesses in the area. Mr. Goodrich stated <br />that the City's ordinance addresses outside storage and Mr. Dubats is not being <br />singled out. Ms. Borris stated that Planning and Zoning inserted Itea #6 on <br />April 29. 1986 <br /> <br />Page 4 of 13 <br /> <br />