Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Riley stated that Staff is recommending that they do not change this, and that the <br />ordinance is well written as it is. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove shared her concern that the communication with Staff is between them <br />and the person who is filling out the application and not the owner of the property. She noted this <br />would make the property owner liable for something that the applicant agrees to with the City <br />without any knowledge of this. She asked if the way this ordinance is currently set up protects the <br />property owner against the decisions made by the applicant. <br /> <br />City Attorney Knaak said this would not be a liability issue as far as the City is concerned. He <br />noted that whatever misrepresentations occur would be between the property owner and the <br />applicant. He shared that there is nothing wrong with the City following up with questions for the <br />property owner. He reiterated that the City would not be liable for any misrepresentations that <br />occur; however, Staff could end up investing time into something that was not valid. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked how much disclosure Staff asks for at these meetings. <br /> <br />City Administrator Hagen shared that he thinks they are blurring lines of risks that are not likely <br />to occur. He shared the reality that a lot of residential applications come in from property owners. <br />He said if an application comes in from someone other than the property owner, they are having a <br />lot of early discussions with the property owner and the applicant. He stated he had never <br />experienced an application where the applicant did not have the support and direction of the <br />property owner. He reiterated that the property owner has to sign the applicant; therefore, making <br />the risk fall on them. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell shared that this discussion has been super helpful as it has given her clarity <br />that she did not have before. She said she is comfortable with where this is. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Council was to not make any changes to the current ordinance in regard to <br />non-owner applicants on residential variances applications. <br /> <br />2.07: Discuss Charter Commission Recruitment <br /> <br />City Administrator Hagen reviewed the Staff report in regard to Charter Commission recruitment. <br />He shared that all four current members have requested reappointment. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Council was in support of these reappointments. <br /> <br />2.08: Determine Canvassing Board Date <br /> <br />City Administrator Hagen reviewed the Staff report concerning setting the Canvassing Board date. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove suggested they schedule this before the Parks and Recreation <br />Commission meeting on November 14. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / October 22, 2024 <br />Page 13 of 15 <br /> <br />